this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
526 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

AUSTIN, Texas – Leaked video shows Hood County Constable Scott London, Hood County GOP Chair Steve Biggers and Hood County GOP Chair candidate Greg Harrell attending a meeting held by Abolish Abortion Texas (AATX) where they supported the death penalty for women who seek abortions or use IVF, including pregnant minors. London and Harrel have also signed onto a pledge from the same group vowing to abolish all circumstances of abortion care in Texas.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago

where they supported the death penalty for women who seek abortions

When you're so pro-life you loop around and become pro-killing.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Conservatism should be illegal. Nothing good in the history of mankind has ever come from it. The only things to come from conservatism are oppression, bigotry and death.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

that's fucked up. crazy fucking right wing nutjobs.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not much different from the Taliban over in Afghanistan. All the religious idiots wanting to kill women, even young girls.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Both are also following an old set of laws, completely unwilling to change anything even as society changes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Y'All Qaeda, everyone.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago

Ah yes. Christian love.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They are taking on IVF. Next they will start to say that people who had C-sections are not really mothers and their children were not actually born. (note: this is a real thing)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Fine; Children born via c-section were not actually born. That means they don't have to pay taxes. Checkmate!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Also means they can kill Macbeth.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

lol nice one

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

May the lord open

[–] [email protected] 67 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They want the death penalty? I can't with these people, I thought the whole point of banning abortion was that "every life is sacred".

Do they ever get tired of being so hypocritical?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't know why this is news to anyone. Do we not teach history any more? They go for the heaviest available sentences and then sit in judgement of women depending on their social and political status. But they'll pretend it's based on some objective standard. So rich conservative women get the "poor girl had a miscarriage" treatment and poor minorities get the heaviest penalty possible for maliciously killing babies.

This is not new, this is not the first time religious conservatives have done this.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No, this has always been about control. They get to decide who lives and who dies, not women, which is why the pro-life types are always also pro death penalty.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In my country they're anti-death-penalty, courtesy of Catholicism. I hate how they made ectopic pregnancies into death sentences but props to them for consistency I guess.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

It's always about power.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The whole point was to punish sexually promiscuous women.

Every life is sacred is just the spin.

Every unborn life is sacred. Every actual born human can go fuck themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

~ David Barnhart

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Not even promiscuous, really. Any woman who wants to have sex and also wants to avoid pregnancy is on their shit list. Doesn't matter if she's with one person for 20 years. Could even be married. Get an abortion, go to jail, oh wait no, the friggin electric chair.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

punish sexually promiscuous women.

So then where does all this whinging about IVF enter into it? How dare you get pregnant by... not... having... sex?

I realize my problem here is that I'm attempting to apply logic where none actually exists. But come on.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Not to mention: that's punishing people who are specifically, deliberately TRYING to become parents. They're probably among the LEAST likely to get abortions.

There isn't any logic. The cruelty is the point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The unborn are innocent, after which they're tainted with original sin. It makes sense in the dumbest way possible.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is really a Catholic interpretation and those in TX are certainly in the Evangelical camp. They don't really think in terms of original sin.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

They do, but they also think that loudly affirming your love for Jesus and then living according to their rules solves it. So it doesn't come up until you refuse them.

Catholics think living a generally good life is enough and that there's forgiveness for most things as long as you remain active in the church, go to confession, and do your penance.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

In my experience, there's generally little difference between an Evangelical and a Sovereign Citizen. They both speak certain magic words that means they don't have to face any consequences; they believe that they have all of the rights of doing so but none of the responsibilities.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

“Attended” meetings? Texasdemocrats, they are the meetings. Why are you, of all voices, giving them an out?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Republicans meet with Republicans. What else is new?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

you lying Texas assholes who claim to be Christians are all going to Hell.. there's nothing Christian about hating abortion, you lying, selfish, proud assholes..

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm starting to wonder if all this insane shit about punishing women over reproductive health care is an attempt to make domestic abuse acceptable.

Like I get it, not having control over someone you have shaky trust in doesn't feel good, but maybe it's not about control and it's about that lack of trust.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Oh no that's the entire trad movement and every time they say the man is the head of the household.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Given that they’re trying to do away with no-fault divorce and one-party divorce, your theory is the natural outcome they seek.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago

This is the same kinda thing that happened recently with Ohio and Michigan republicans where they were discussing how they intend to ban all gender affirming care for literally everyone. It's almost like the Republicans are bigots and monsters who want to enact their bigotry and awfulness on the country.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 5 months ago

Envious of the the talibans and the stonings?...

[–] [email protected] 145 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Surprised it's a leaked video, and not a campaign ad

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago

Don’t give them any ideas, the tube’s gotten toxic enough lately.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 months ago (2 children)

By this logic, all the republicans that have caused the premature death of people by not providing healthcare, homeless services, meals for children, living wages, and cause people to be caught in vicious cycles of poverty and drug abuse should also be put to death. Line them up!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

It's not logic, and trying to argue with them will never work. It's disdain for and a desire to control women, period. Conservatism is about hierarchy, and people having their proper place in it. These laws and outlooks are about trying to keep women in their place in the hierarchy. The same can be said about laws against LGBTQ people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, my butt is symmetrical. Both left and right buttcheeks are there.

#ButtBothSides

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

This will have no effect in an election year. /s