this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
85 points (96.7% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6616 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The simple mechanic of long division. I was sick from school for a couple days, when I came back they'd already gone past the instruction on long division and simply expected me to do the problems, which I couldn't because I couldn't make any sense out of them.

It was years later when I was practicing on my own that I that had an insight -- OH you have to carry the remainder and re-divide into it to get the answer. Very simple, but no one bothered to explain that to me. They just couldn't understand what i wasn't understanding.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Differential equations. Had the worst math teacher ever for LA and DE. I memorized enough to pass the class but did not really understand diff eq. Next semester, we used diff eq in my physics classes with a great professor who explained them beautifully. What form do you think the solution takes? Using an algebraic formula for that form, solve for the unknowns. Tada! If there is a solution, you've just solved a differential equation!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exponentiation. I don't think it was ever really explained before, instead it was treated like something I should've known.

One day I watched a YouTube video that made the world of difference, then I got it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The number of math epiphanies I've had on youtube is way too high. Good math teachers are a rare breed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes a specific explanation works for you, but school has to be generic enough for explanation to work for most. There are probably a million videos with explanations that are utter shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

There are, unfortunately, also millions of teachers who are utter shit. I appreciate every single one of the good ones I've met along the way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

For sure! The same can probably be said for science teachers too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Anything math related from before high school, it gets dumbed down too much and once you get the actual way to do it in higher math classes, it made a lot more sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Physical Chemistry. First semester of first year of university. I couldn't understand anything that our 80+ year old professor was mumbling, and the slides he used were terrible (full of abréviations, diagrams missing steps, etc.) Although I was getting solid grades in all my other courses, I failed the first PhysChem midterm with something like 23%. I resigned myself to my fate and sheepishly told my mom (I was still living home at the time and parents were paying for my studies). She got a mad glint in her eyes, and asked for all the course materials. By next week, she had completely reworked the material and came up with new tables and diagrams to help explain the concepts. I was amazed at how simple it all really was. For example, atomic bonds aren't static but can "wiggle" around in several ways, and we can even calculate fairly easily the amount of energy required for each wiggle.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

It's = it is

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is very dumb, but when I was in middle school, my sister explained blow jobs to me. She said you bob your head up and down on the penis, and that you could practice on a hotdog. I did not understand. I thought she meant like nodding bob your head. Like it would be in your mouth, and you would nod and it would hit your tongue, then the roof of your mouth, then your tongue etc. I practiced on a hotdog.

In high school, I learned what she actually meant, like bob your head so it goes in and out. I was a sheltered kid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I can guarantee you that someone out there would have loved you version.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 5 months ago (2 children)

When doing a convolution of two curves in time, you flip one of them backwards.

Our shit statistics teacher made it so complicated.

And then one day, next semester, in a lab for signals class, the TA casually said "flip one, so they both start at zero seconds" and half the class started convulsing as an entire semester worth of misunderstood math magically snapped into place.

Lots of engineering teachers, have no business being teachers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Signals and transforms was the low point of my education, damn you Fourier

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

It depends on how you look at it. Perhaps that low point was just the first evidence of an increase in your life’s amplitude.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Could of could have should of should have

This was explained to me here on Lemmy last month.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'm also noticing an increase in the misuse of wary vs weary. Wary = cautious, weary = tired

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The frustrating thing is that I know this, but because the voice in my head is my voice and has my accent, "of" and "have" sound basically the same so when I'm speed typing I accidentally write "of" and when I'm proof reading it, either out loud or in my head, it sounds the exact same to read "could of" or "could have".

I've gotten around this in my professional writing by proof reading everything out loud while doing a silly accent. Or getting a screen reader to read it back in a robot voice.

But for random comments on the internet, I don't bother, so I'll occasionally get a helpful person explaining the mistake, and they're always polite and I appreciate it. I just wish I knew how to make it stick when I'm actually writing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He : Who
Him : Whom

He gave me the ball. Who gave me the ball?

I gave the ball to him. To whom did I give the ball?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah but unless it's directly after a preposition you sound like a stuffy asshole. "Whom did I give the ball to?" Whom is falling out of usage in general and I won't be sad to see it go.

And in some cases it's difficult to line up the he/him, as in "Give this to whoever needs it." In that case the whoever is almost pulling double duty of being the object of the preposition while needing to function as the subject in the clause "[subject] needs it". But if you see the entire clause as the object of the preposition it works out with "whoever".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Jeff and me went shopping"

Vs

"Jeff and I went shopping"

If you can take Jeff out and it sounds right then it's grammatically correct. For example you wouldn't say "me went shopping".

"That looks fake to Jeff and me"

"That looks fake to Jeff and I"

In that case you wouldn't say "that looks fake to I".

I never understood this until a technical writer I worked with made it so plain one day.

Edit: formatting

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Could’ve. Should’ve. Embrace laziness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Could've should've would've

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Too lazy to use an apostrophe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I often do but if I am writing formally it then shows 😥

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Did you take linear algebra?

Did you ever understand eigenvectors? (I didn't.)

BEHOLD

They could have showed me this video, and saved me quite a lot of time and difficulty.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I had no idea there even was a graphical interpretation of matrices, why did no one tell me this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You should watch the whole series if you haven't yet; it is phenomenal. There's another one on calculus (in addition to videos on all sorts of great stuff) but the linear algebra one is just especially mind blowing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

the whole series

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Love 3blue1brown

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

behold

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Class A/B/C in networking. I always wondered why there were classes if you would use a subnetmask regardless.

Took me a while to realize that class notation was only used before sub netmasks were a thing. The best you could do is to ignore them completely.

Networking is a wonderful field where you think you understand it until you look at the parts and realize you had it all wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The class notation is still meaningful. If we were talking about your particular network mask I might ask you what class it is. Telling me would give an understanding of size or hops or whatever. Granted, it is class C 99% of the time. Probably smaller. But then I’m certainly no networkologist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I still don’t understand what a network mask is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lemme try: an IP is the address of your computer and only a single number. If you want to group clients you have to define a way to separate these 32bit number into a part that defines the group and a part that defines the number of the client in that group. That's what the netmask is for. Example:

IP: 10.0.0.1

Netmask: 255.255.0.0

In binary this gets more clear:

IP: 0000 1001.0000 0000.0000 0000.0000 0001

Netmask: 1111 1111.1111 1111.0000 0000.0000 0000

The netmask is always a bunch of 1 first, then 0 until you got 32 of it. 1 define the parts of the IP that define the group, 0 the client.

10.0 is the group, 0.1 is the number of the client in our example. All clients which IP begin with 10.0 are in the same group and can talk to each other without needing a router.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This is simplified, like it assumes routers handle everything when that's not really the case but hopefully it still illustrates the idea.

Your network might have 5 devices connected to it. To uniquely represent those 5 devices, they need 5 addresses. If all that exists is your own network, then any 5 addresses would work, as long as they are unique. 0.0.0.0 through 0.0.0.4 would work.

But your network is connected to a larger network, probably your ISP's network. Let's say your ISP also has 5 clients. If they gave their clients the 0.0.0.0 through 0.0.0.4 addresses, they would clash with your own network addresses. So maybe they'd use 0.0.0.0 through 0.0.4.0 instead.

Your ISP is also connected to another network, which is connected to another one, and so on.

Each destination on the large network made up of all these smaller networks needs to have a unique address for other devices to find them. Part of the address will be assigned by higher level routers and part of it will be assigned by the router directly connected to the device.

The subnet mask (or network mask) basically lets the router know which parts of the address have been assigned to it by higher powers and which ones it can use to assign unique addresses to its own clients. It's a bit mask where each 1 means the higher network "owns" that bit in the address (and the router can't change it for any of its clients) and a 0 means the router can use that bit to uniquify its own clients.

So a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 means that the first three numbers of that IP address have been assigned to the router and the last one is free for it to assign to up to 256 clients.

If ( ( myaddress xor targetaddress ) bitwise-and mask ) gives a non-zero result, then the address isn't on the router's client network and the packet needs to be sent upstream. If it gives a zero, then ( not ( mask ) bitwise-and targetaddress ) will give a number that can be used to look up the physical port (or wifi info) that the router needs to use to make contact with the destination.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

A subnet is defined by its netmask. Classes are useless nowadays IMHO.

At least for me they created more confusion than anything else. Why are there classes if the netmask defines the subnet size? Because there was a time before netmasks, just ignore them

load more comments
view more: next ›