this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
546 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23397 readers
3618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

The company that has people dying unattended and alone in their warehouses, despite 24/7 worker surveillance to ensure compliance with draconic worker rules even robots would protest against, doesn't believe in labour rights?

Goodness! I don't know what colour shocked is, but I'm positively radiant!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The question is: will they allow adding cocaine into coca-cola once again or they expect that surplus productivity will come from nowhere?

[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Wow, I've read the whole thing. If that goes through, they are going straight back to the 1880 labor's law, with child labor, no overtime and whatever the company wants to contract you. The consequences will be massive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I thought that's what their goal has been, to get back to that time before workers had any protection

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sadly, it took blood and death to get the worker’s rights we do have, and only apathetic voters to lose them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's incredible. Let's see how those check and balance ⚖️ do now.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Modern Apathy failed to repair the damage, but the ENTHUSIASTIC giveaway of the country to the rich in both capital and power, the "Reagan revolution," is most directly responsible for the later Citizens United, Trump, and our imminent collapse.

Apathy didn't destroy this country for the people, Enthusiastic greed worship BY the people did. Greed is a personal failing, character deficit, and is every bit as dangerous and destructive to society as hatred. The Gordon Geckos and Mr. Potters of the nation are supposed to be hated, booed, and shunned by decent people for their antisocial activities, not worshipped as the celebrities and...🤮... Role models they are treated like today.

The owners have spent decades propagandizing us to forget what a societal poison greed is as they took over.

Oh I'm sorry it's not greed anymore. I meant ~~greed~~ rational self-interest. Shout out to George Orwell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Mommy, the weak men created the hard times once again 😭

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm honestly shocked I hadn't heard about this until now, seems like a big deal

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was surely all over the Washington Post, i mean the amazon guy owns it, right?

Why wouldn’t it be, yknow, bang, right on the ol front page there?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

eh, I don't really buy that. I think WaPo has maintained editorial independence pretty well. Yes, you can find memes that show WaPo pro-Amazon opinion columns, but if you actually look on your own and not just trust the memes, you can find similar opposing views in their editorials that criticize Bezos

edit: if you don't believe me, the coverage is evenly split: https://www.washingtonpost.com/search/?query=amazon

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is the boiled frog effect.

If the SCOTUS creates enough national crises, and that's what they've been actively doing, rolling back the rights and protections of individuals while further empowering capital as citizens discover there is just no recourse, then the crises they continue to create, as dire as they are, just feel like another tuesday.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Moreover, it seems to be happening faster and faster. This is a democratic emergency. We are dangerously close to a critical point where our votes become meaningless and we simply have an authoritarian regime in a trenchcoat.

Vote because your life depends on it, because if you don't, you might not get another chance.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 224 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Everything I don't like is unconstitutional."

[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

-This SCOTUS, unironically unfortunately

The Federalist Society is an organization of right-wing extremists conspiring against the United States as far as I'm concerned, and they have won.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What was that thing Jefferson said?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

He said that he didn't fight in any wars and instead fucked off and let the poors die.

He talked a good game but fuck that slaver.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know what he said, but I wish he added "...so shit or get off the pot" to the end of it.

Because it won't get any easier when the owners have armies of humanoid robots defending them in addition to the means of production/propaganda/state violence/governmental capture that they already have to keep us under this class occupation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably something about how bad black people were? Except in bed of course.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›