this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
262 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4762 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i love the insane fervor over her endorsing biden, the most milquetoast (at best!) thing anyone could possibly do, when he's already been canonised by the DNC because he's 90 and stubborn and thinks he deserves another term because that's what the good guys get

it just makes my stomach turn, both in 2020 and now, when people act like this doddering establishment old man is some sort of exciting force to rally around. he's joe biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Has she said or done anything? Or are they just afraid she might?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Fox claims they themselves are just an entertainment network, not news. Shouldn't they stay out of politics just like they want her to?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But hey, let’s ask Kid Rock what he thinks about national debt

Fuck republicunts

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure I understand the republican strategy around Taylor Swift.

Like, doesn't harassing her for basically no reason only increase the likelihood that she does get involved in political battles, not reduce?

This just seems like another hair-brained, half thought through plan.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nobody ever accused Republicans of being smart

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Conservatives say they think musicians should stay out of politics. The same conservatives celebrate Kid Rock, Ted Nugent, Trace Adkins and any other piece of shit who loudly encourages their audience to vote for a seditious rapist.

It's almost like conservatives are just liars who are fully incapable of honesty on any topic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Crap - I liked Trace Adkins music too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Taylor Swift will be 35 years old before the inauguration. There is still time to sub her in as vice president.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Is there a requirement to be 35 years old for VP?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes, according to the 12th Amendment:

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

It's the same reason why Obama couldn't be VP. He's ineligible because he's served two terms already. If you can't be President, you can't be Vice-President. And that makes sense, since the VP could become President at any time if something goes sideways.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

A key duty of the VP is to become President if something happens to the President. It may not be a requirement, but it would cause the Speaker of the House, who might be from another party, to be the one who steps in.

You don't want that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Says the channel that is the de facto D-List celebrity to deranged right wing pundit pipeline

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I want to hear the arguments between swifty kids, and their shitty fox news parents.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

That's rich coming from the network that's been fellating a reality tv star 24/7 for 8 years.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's funny is that she hasn't endorsed anyone. But they keep raising such a stink on the mere thought that she might endorse Biden and have demanded that she doesn't voice her Biden endorsement far and wide to the point, now, it has become assumed by most that she does endorse him. If anyone does, in fact, give a damn about her endorsement, the wackos yelling on the right have made her de facto position a pro-Biden position. Exactly what they're complaining about. Now she doesn't even need to endorse him in order to basically endorse him. Dolts.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

she hasn't endorsed anyone.

Well, she did endorse Biden in 2020. Don't see why she would have changed her mind one bit in 2024.>

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She’s been speaking out against the Supreme Court killing Roe, and she’s shown that she can drive registration with young woman. And young women are swing left of center.

She doesn’t have to endorse anyone to terrify the right.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Your ideology is total shit when the mere suggestion that citizens should vote as they please is a threat to your existence. The GOP's days are numbered.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unless they get away with suppressing the vote. Which they’ve been very successful at.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know which is worse - Fox telling an artist to not be political or the NYT reporting that Fox is telling an artist not to be political.

I'm very, very tired of the news being the news. It's no longer about reporting events and ideas but generating content and ad revenue. We've been the frog in the pot for a while now. How much worse is it going to get?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

They're all entertainers. I don't see the difference except Taylor Swift has a day job.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

Taylor Swift is grabbing conservatives by their collective pussies and they don’t like it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah. Look what it did to Fox News. Turned them from a sack of shit to a treasonous sack of shit.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Why? Just because Fox News doesn’t broadcast anything vaguely affiliated with real world politics doesn’t mean others can’t talk about it.

[–] [email protected] 198 points 9 months ago (3 children)

But it's okay for a pillow salesman to be involved in politics?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

And all the Megachurch (MAGA-Church?) priests…?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Or a "news company" to be /gestures wildly at Fox News/

[–] [email protected] 117 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What about kid rock? If you can call him a musician....

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What about a reality TV celebrity like, oh I don't know, Donald Trump?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A movie star, like Raygun?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (3 children)

A bodybuilder, like Arnold?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A comedian, like Al Franken?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

No, that one wasn't okay. Find a flimsy excuse to get him out.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A wrestler, like Jesse Ventura?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

Tbf the Governator was actually half decent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

In fact, we should just get rid of news outlets (Fox, NBC) entirely and only allow news agencies (AP News, Reuters) to report on news and politics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

in some places fox news isnt allowed to use the word "news" in the name, because they are, by their own definition "mostly editorial/entertainment"

they avoid the markets where they dont get to pretend to be news

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

This article discusses reactions from some Fox News commentators to the possibility of Taylor Swift endorsing President Biden in the 2024 election. Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, and others on Fox News urged Swift not to get involved in politics. Some speculated that Swift's relationship with Travis Kelce was engineered by Democrats. Hannity drew a connection between Swift and George Soros, noting Soros' son helped fund the sale of Swift's song catalog. However, not all at Fox News were negative - sports analyst Jay Glazer praised Swift as a "genius" and saw nothing problematic about her or the NFL. In summary, several Fox News personalities strongly discouraged Swift from supporting Biden, while at least one commentator admired her musical talents.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›