Hey David — if you're so smart, do you have any idea how we got here?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
“We don’t have anyone on the list from America.” [citation needed]
We don't have anyone from America on that list because we only started counting after they massacred the native nations. It's also harder to point to an individual who specifically was responsible as no one has absolute power there.
reposting propaganda from Brooks is morally wrong and foolish
they post fake views like this so that you'll let them into your sphere of influence/ reading material SO THEY CAN LIE TO YOU MORE
you enable them by promoting this Kayfabe, these fictional narratives
HA! If anyone doesn’t know who David Brooks is, a quick search will tell you.
And just in case, don’t follow the guy.
With genuine curiosity, why did you choose to repost rhetoric by David Brooks today?
Well, it was posted earlier by someone else but with a fox news link. So I wanted a different link, and thought others may appreciate it.
I’m enjoying his thrashing the republiQans fwiw, but I have no illusions about David Brooks. Certainly I have less illusions about David Brooks than David Brooks has.
When you see Fox spreading something, maybe you should interrogate that a little bit. Do you trust their motives? Do you think stuff they want to share should be given a larger platform?
Then if that doesn't work, DM me the next time you want to post David Brooks and I will verbally abuse you to the point where you don't want to internet no more 😀 👍
Are you one of those purity test lefties who can't bring themselves to vote for Harris because the primaries were a sham?
David Brooks sucks major league ass but if he's shitting on Elon, bigly, and if it's getting spread across the Foxiverse then all the better, I say.
they post fake views like this so that you’ll let them into your sphere of influence/ reading material SO THEY CAN LIE TO YOU MORE
you enable them by promoting this Kayfabe, these fictional narratives
No you fuckwit I'm tired of seeing billionaire kayfabe spam from known hatemongers spammed by fuckwits
you're also ugly
everyone thinks you smell but nobody likes you enough to tell you
I see. Well, eat a block then.
Welcome to the resistance you partisan fucking hack.
No shit right.
If it weren't for the decades of sane washing liberal and conservative talking heads have offered the mind of bullshit narratives they push, none of this would have ever been able to be come established.
To what extent can the results be attributed to Musk vs Trump?
Sure, Musk’s DOGE was particularly incompetent, but was there any way of implementing Trump’s intended policies that wouldn’t have been similarly disastrous?
Trump vs Musk damages is a distinction without a difference. It's like asking if either Hitler vs Himmler were more responsible for the Holocaust. At the end of the day they were the ones in power, they made the decisions, either had the power to stop, and they didn't.
There’s a difference if Trump and his supporters use Musk as a scapegoat to distance themselves from the fallout.
Did anyone think that wasn't the plan? Survival Of The Fittest is basically bullshit, but it's also the main driver of Conservative philosophy.
Survival of the fittest doesn't meant the individual. I cannot build a barn by myself nearly as well as I can in a group. I cannot farm as easily alone as with a commune. The fittest are communal.
Well, it's selfishness, but they frame it that way.