this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
165 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23823 readers
2913 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

DAVID BROOKS, NEW YORK TIMES: Yes, I'm not sure it was wreckage. There was wreckage if you're at NIH. There are wreckage at certain agencies, but the guy only saved $65 billion out of a multitrillion-dollar budget.

So, as a budget matter, you would not say he had a big effect, but he did manage to destroy NIH and USAID. And the USAID one is the one I haven't gotten over. And so there's folks at Boston University who count, how many people have died because of what DOGE did at USAID? And USAID was a very ill-managed organization. That's true.

But according to the Boston University folks, so far, 55,000 adults have died of AIDS in the four months since Trump was elected, 6,000 children are dead because of what DOGE did. That's just PEPFAR, the HIV. You add them all up, that's 300,000 dead, and we're four months in.

Now, you add, accumulate that over four years, the number of dead grows very high. There are mass murderers in the world, Pol Pot, Mao Tse-Tung, Stalin. We don't have anybody on the list from America. And I don't think it's the same as committing the kind of genocide they did. But by taking away that agency and being at least semi-responsible for the deaths of probably by the end of this hundreds of thousands of millions of people, that's Elon Musk's legacy.

And the people who work at Tesla and SpaceX may want to think about that.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

Hey David — if you're so smart, do you have any idea how we got here?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“We don’t have anyone on the list from America.” [citation needed]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

We don't have anyone from America on that list because we only started counting after they massacred the native nations. It's also harder to point to an individual who specifically was responsible as no one has absolute power there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

reposting propaganda from Brooks is morally wrong and foolish

they post fake views like this so that you'll let them into your sphere of influence/ reading material SO THEY CAN LIE TO YOU MORE

you enable them by promoting this Kayfabe, these fictional narratives

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

HA! If anyone doesn’t know who David Brooks is, a quick search will tell you.

And just in case, don’t follow the guy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With genuine curiosity, why did you choose to repost rhetoric by David Brooks today?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, it was posted earlier by someone else but with a fox news link. So I wanted a different link, and thought others may appreciate it.

I’m enjoying his thrashing the republiQans fwiw, but I have no illusions about David Brooks. Certainly I have less illusions about David Brooks than David Brooks has.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you see Fox spreading something, maybe you should interrogate that a little bit. Do you trust their motives? Do you think stuff they want to share should be given a larger platform?

Then if that doesn't work, DM me the next time you want to post David Brooks and I will verbally abuse you to the point where you don't want to internet no more 😀 👍

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you one of those purity test lefties who can't bring themselves to vote for Harris because the primaries were a sham?

David Brooks sucks major league ass but if he's shitting on Elon, bigly, and if it's getting spread across the Foxiverse then all the better, I say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they post fake views like this so that you’ll let them into your sphere of influence/ reading material SO THEY CAN LIE TO YOU MORE

you enable them by promoting this Kayfabe, these fictional narratives

No you fuckwit I'm tired of seeing billionaire kayfabe spam from known hatemongers spammed by fuckwits

you're also ugly

everyone thinks you smell but nobody likes you enough to tell you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I see. Well, eat a block then.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welcome to the resistance you partisan fucking hack.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

No shit right.

If it weren't for the decades of sane washing liberal and conservative talking heads have offered the mind of bullshit narratives they push, none of this would have ever been able to be come established.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To what extent can the results be attributed to Musk vs Trump?

Sure, Musk’s DOGE was particularly incompetent, but was there any way of implementing Trump’s intended policies that wouldn’t have been similarly disastrous?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trump vs Musk damages is a distinction without a difference. It's like asking if either Hitler vs Himmler were more responsible for the Holocaust. At the end of the day they were the ones in power, they made the decisions, either had the power to stop, and they didn't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There’s a difference if Trump and his supporters use Musk as a scapegoat to distance themselves from the fallout.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did anyone think that wasn't the plan? Survival Of The Fittest is basically bullshit, but it's also the main driver of Conservative philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Survival of the fittest doesn't meant the individual. I cannot build a barn by myself nearly as well as I can in a group. I cannot farm as easily alone as with a commune. The fittest are communal.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Well, it's selfishness, but they frame it that way.