this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31095 readers
771 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I used Plex for my home media for almost a year, then it stopped playing nice for reasons I gave up on diagnosing. While looking at alternatives, I found Jellyfin which is much more responsive, IMO, and the UI is much nicer as well.

It gets relegated to playing Fraggle Rock and Bluey on repeat for my kiddo these days, but I am absolutely in love with the software.

What are some other FOSS gems that are a better experience UX/UI-wise than their proprietary counterparts?

EDIT: Autocorrect turned something into "smaller" instead of what I meant it to be when I wrote this post, and I can't remember what I meant for it to say so it got axed instead.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I personally run an older build of emby, the open source software jellyfin was forked from. It's very similar, but I found emby's video transcoding (or explicit not transcoding) to be more reliable

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. XBMC forked off into Plex. Plex introduced a far better UI.
  2. XBMC became Kodi. Kodi learned from Plex.
  3. Jellyfin came along and learned from both of them.

So I don't think you can really criticise Plex too much here. They were perhaps getting complacent and they've definitely been shown up, but they were an important step to where we are now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree, I think it's still perfectly reasonable to criticize Plex. Specifically for that complacency. Just because they were an important step to getting where we are does not mean they are above reproach.

Besides, I wasn't really criticizing Plex? All I said was that I prefer the UI/UX in Jellyfin, and that Jellyfin is still "Just Working" where Plex failed for reasons unknown. Plex isn't bad, I enjoyed using it while I did. I just found something FOSS to take it's place. 🙂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You definitely can criticise them, but yeah maybe that word is too strong for what we're describing here. I just meant that it isn't all that unusual that Plex have fallen behind, there's an ebb and flow to development - but it's very nice that the FOSS offering is in the lead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here is my opinion on some FOSS software. PS, I'm too old to give a shit about team mentality, I just want stuff to work. Also, my motivation for liking FOSS is not so much "free", but rather "unencumbered and unrestricted shared human technology and knowledge".

  • GNOME, for the hate it gets, it comes close to getting everything right. I'd give it a 95/100 score. Windows a 30/100, and MacOS a 35/100. No verdict/comment on KDE as I haven't used it. I have good reasons for disliking W10/W11 and separate ones for MacOS. As desktop environments, they are both shit for each their own reasons.
  • Blender. 3D/Scultping/Drawing/Video Editing. Aside from Linux kernel, the most impressive and well managed FOSS project there is. I grew up with pirated 3dsmax, and what a dream it would be to grow up today with Blender as it is.
  • Linux as a OS kernel. One can argue about the desktop market share, but people don't know better. They think the software that runs on it defines it. But, there is a reason why 100% of top 500 supercomputers in this world run on Linux. I'd also mention the Arch/AUR community. Doesn't matter if you use Arch or not, arch/aur wiki is a goldmine.
  • Godot: 2D game engine. As a 3d game engine, it's not nearly as good as the non-FOSS competition.
  • Firefox: If it wasn't for Firefox, I don't know what I would do. I don't trust chrome one single bit.
  • Alacrity terminal: I'm sure there are plenty great FOSS terminal emulators, but the built in ones for MacOS and Windows are garbage.
  • Prusa Slicer: I think this one is as good as the commercial counterparts for FDM G-code generation.
  • VLC. Mixed feelings about this one, as I think it's UI is lacking, but since it plays almost everything the UX ends up being great.
  • LibreOffice Writer. Perhaps debatable. But the fact that you can trust LibreOffice to respect and adhere to the OpenDocumentFormat, and equally trust Microsoft Word to deliberately not do so in subtle ways, LibreOffice Writer is ultimately the better software IMHO.

Projects I wish had an edge over commercial proprietary software:

  • Gimp. It just isn't as good, even if you get used to it. Some things, of course, it can do much better (e.g the G'Mic QT filter pack). The lack of non-destructive work flows is the key part that is missing.
  • FreeCAD. It's good, and you can do wonders with it, but oh so rough compared to onshape/Fusion/etc.
  • Darktable. Not as good as commercial counterparts like Lightroom.
  • Kdenlive. Not as good as Davinci Resolve, or the adobe counterparts.
  • LMMS: Not as good as most commercial DAWs.
  • Krita: This one is actually not too far away from being best in class. I still suspect photoshop and has an edge
  • InkScape: A "best for some vector things but not all"-kinda thing. It's FOSS nature makes it the defacto vector editing software for certain kind of makers. But as a graphical vector editing suite, adobe's stuff is just much more solid.

Mobile stuff that I think is better than the counterpart, or at least so good that I don't care if there is a counterpart

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the praise! We're not on Lemmy too much, but someone in the Core Team caught site of this and shared it with me. If you're wondering who I am: github

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was setting up a Plex server, but when I noticed I had to pay to be able to play my own content on my phone I immediately switched to jellyfin. Haven't been able to test it yet, but as long as I don't need to pay them to be able to watch my own content on my own devices on my own network, I'll be happy!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, you don't have to pay us a dime.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Awesome for being a free tool, but it pales in comparison to Photoshop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

LibreOffice, I'm not sure it's better than M$Office per se, but it does everything most people need it to.

Chocolatey GUI > Microsoft store

Inkscape, I'm not even sure what the proprietary version is?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One thing that I hate about VLC (hasn't made me drop it in 15 years but alas) is that you can hit E to go forward one frame but there's no key (nor capacity to set your own) to go back one frame.

Is it a niche use case? Sure probably. But not having the option to set one myself kills me whenever I frameskip one too far and have to shift-left and mash E again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

i don't think it's a niche feature, and totally agree, very annoying. there's some long technical explanation about like stream buffering but i don't care, many other players have it. you can rewind but not rewind 1 frame?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From what I recall it has to do with encoding and how the data stored references the following frame but not previous. Still seems like some engineering could be done to solve, so it it's not as simple as "current Frame--"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The thing I find hard to convey is that FLOSS software is superior to proprietary software for many reasons, most of which are non-technical: FLOSS software is superior to proprietary software if it isn't spying on you, if it's governance is collective, if it's not build to make you pay for things that should be free, if it lets you decide where your data goes, etc...

we're often missing the point when we attempt at side-by-side comparison of FLOSS and proprietary software.. It's usually one-dimentional, and playing on our opponent's field: these companies racketing their users based on rent-based exploitative business models will always have more resources than independant developpers to improve "UX/UI"... so I think this must not be the only prism through which reading these things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal. Who else is making a post quantum secure e2ee algorithm and making sure the code is open source and not duplicating the keys everywhere? Thank goodness for the kind devs on this project and for other FOSS projects everywhere!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The time when they essentially went closed source to implement MobileCoin in kind of a covert operation really didn't do them any favors, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Blender for video editing. I haven't even touched its 3D animation features.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GNOME Document Scanner is surprisingly working smoothly out-of-the-box (with Brother printer at least)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Desktop: Zotero, RStudio, Thunderbird, Sumatra PDF, Notepad++, NoMacs (image viewer), Espanso (text expander), qBittorrent, Inkscape

Android: FairEmail or K9 Mail, Authenticator Pro, Feeder, F-Droid, Pocket Casts, SD Maid

Multi-platform: Home Assistant, Wireguard, Syncthing, Jellyfin, Kodi, Samba, Firefox

Honorable mentions that don't have the best UX but are still hugely appreciated for existing: Joplin, QGIS

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I absolutely love Espanso. So much faster than TextExpander and I like that it's config is plain text files.

You're insane though if you think Inkscape is better than Illustrator. I'm not an Adobe fanboy by any means, but it is a really good (if bloated) product.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OBS is so good that I don't know why anyone would ever use X-split.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I adore OBS. I've been teaching my friends the basics on how to use it, as they've all been using some proprietary crap that makes their lives marginally easier in one or two areas but adds a huge headache in others.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have any videos? Can you record tracks and musical production type stuff?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I am by no means a master at OBS, and I wouldn't know where to point you to learn. Everything I know I've learned by either poking around in the software or googling specific questions, i.e. "how to overlay twitch chat in OBS". As you can probably guess, I used to use it to stream to twitch. Not very suddenly, mind, but I did it. Lol!

OBS is designed for streaming out and recording video, not really for music production. I'm sure there are some FOSS music production softwares worth checking out, though!

load more comments
view more: next ›