this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)
technology
23791 readers
158 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Elon Musk: flings car into space
Space: flings Starlinks back to earth
now we are learning just how the sun's activity can affect [satellites]
Corporate Techbros once again retreading stuff that NASA and the Soviet Union learned in the 60s, because why learn from the past when you can make the dumbest possible decision at every turn?
People in the 60s didn't even have smartphones or AI, so I mean how smart could they be?
Just a minor inconvenience
Two scoops of razin', Elon
alexa play red sun in the sky
I remember seeing a post about someone on twitter complaining to Elon about his 250 USD monthly starlink bill turning to 1000 dollars and something about unreliability. I wonder how much further it will increase. 
A family member has Starlink because they live in a rural area and I think it was basically the only option without cutting down trees. They both mostly work from home but anything past conference calls and email is dog water and gives me flash backs to 56k, like you can stream a show or play a game online, you are not doing both.
Holy shit, at that point just start a jellyfin server so you can have Radarr download your shows in the background.
:sicko-sun:
A deadly laser, you say?
Haha
There's no possible way they could've predicted an unforeseen contingency like this.
who could've thought that there was going to be a big bright and hot star just eight light-minutes away from the satellites?
The headline is pretty misleading. The solar maximimum lowers their time in orbit by up to ten days. The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster, getting them out of the way for their replacements.
The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster
then just this once our interests align, because that probably lowers the chance of a Kessler Syndrome scenario, which was always my main concern in relation to this satellite swarm bullshit
They're in way too low an orbit to pose a Kessler threat since any debris would fall back down on a scale of a few months to under a decade. The danger comes from stuff that's at decade-to-century lifetimes.
Starlink sucks for a bunch of other reasons like the huge rocket emissions to put a bunch of astronomy-polluting garbage in space that's designed to fail.
They also have massively increased the level of aluminum oxide in the atmosphere from all the satellites burning up (something like a 30% increase over baseline), which might damage the ozone layer.
Apparently half of all active satellites are Starlink and they plan to increase the current number by ~8x.
holy shit, I knew it was bad but not that bad
this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster, getting them out of the way for their replacements
They can deorbit them at any time though?
As far as I'm aware, yes. Maybe the article meant they could use less fuel to do so?
I reread the article, I reckon it's about satellites in general deorbiting faster to avoid a Kessler syndrome scenario
Sean Elvidge at the University of Birmingham, UK, says this effect could benefit satellite operators like SpaceX by removing dead satellites from orbit more quickly that could otherwise pose a danger to other satellites. “It’s speeding up that process,” he says. However, it could limit our ability to operate satellites in orbits below 400 kilometres, known as very low Earth orbit. “It shows that could be challenging,” he says.
any fuel is... already in space, it's not like they're getting it back if they don't use it
I just looked it up, and yes they deorbit the satellites, but their re-entry orbit takes up to six months. So speeding that up does seem advantageous.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I wish them all a swift return from orbit and minimum return on investment 🙏