this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
381 points (98.2% liked)

politics

23952 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/RqDyI

Sounds like a bully met a real killer...

Trump is just Malibu's Most Wanted

(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Who thinks they've actually spent the money to Maintain thier nukes. Try it I say. All these scumbags can go hide in thei bunkers and their wealth will Mean jack squat. They'll need to fend off the hordes of people who will rip them limb from limb before the end of the day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Of all those nukes, about 50% just wouldn't respond if launched. They'd just sit there. Poor maintenance, some base commander in the past 6 decades sold the payload or other gear, they've never been tested or updated, they've been stripped for scrap metal, etc.

Of the other 30%, half of those might detonate in the silos, which would be hilarious, and most of the rest would probably flame out in flight, and crash unpredictably. A few might actually fly properly, but not many.

Call his bluff, and let him launch. If he does, whether they fly or not, bomb Moscow into the stone age (conventional bombs, he'd probably irradiate his own country by then anyway, with their garbage bombs), take over the entire nation and let the UN manage it for a while, and hunt down Putin and his fortune.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There's a very high chance that most of them no longer work. Although if even just 5% of the ones deployed are working, that's still over 80. Which is more than enough to start WW3.

And it's almost unthinkable that they haven't kept strict maintenance on at least a few.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Try it I say

Instance checks out \jk

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

What a weird article. It bounces from hyperbole to real discussion to Fiona Hill's childhood.

But as for ww3, lol no. Russia is spent. They can make a mess of Ukraine and Central Asia but they are spent.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

We've all seen it too. "C'mon Vladimir, stop it! 😭"

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Putin, who has maintained the same “tight team” of top diplomats around him for the past 25 years, dispatched his Stanford-educated economic adviser Kirill Dmitriev, former ambassador to Washington Yuri Ushakov, and Sergei Lavrov, his comic villain foreign minister, to recent talks in Saudi Arabia.

“These guys are really skilled diplomats. They all speak absolutely excellent English,” said Hill. “They can talk the hind leg off a donkey. They can turn you around in circles. They’ve got an answer for everything.”

Batting for the US are Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, Mike Waltz, Mr Trump’s erstwhile national security adviser, and his special envoy Steve Witkoff, a former real estate dealer. Between them, they have less than a year’s-worth of cabinet-level experience.

So, what does the dancing Russian bear make of these three cotillion debutantes? “They’re eating the neophytes on the US side for dinner,” said Hill.

I saw Hill's testimony and she is extremely credible and intelligent. This is her bottom line, and it is that we are fighting global information and geopolitical warfare against a merciless and shrewd veteran with a clown car circus act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Putin may or may not have video proof of Trump raping a child but Trump sure acts like Putin might.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I still kinda want it to be the "pee tape" everyone was speculating about last time around. Because that's the funniest possible piece of kompromat I can think of that Putin could have on ole Donnie Boy. Realistically though considering his longstanding friendship with Epstein...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I doubt that Hitlerpig would even be embarrassed by a pee tape. He'd probably be proud of it. If Putain has anything on Hitlerpig that Hitlerpig is legitimately embarrassed or afraid of, then it must be legitimately bad/evil. My money is on kids being involved....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've always figured the pee tape doesn't really exist. But that doesn't stop the Russians from spreading rumors about it, anyway. It's another way to get into Trump's head. It stokes his paranoia even further.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought the pee tape didn't exist either, but then a Russian Call Girl was able to place Manafort on Russian Oligarch Derapaska's yacht, because she was there, and then she claimed to be the person that brokered the underage prostitutes in the Pee Video. Her story about Manafort on the yacht turned out to be true, and Manafort was convicted, so she seems to have some credibility.

For those who don't know what the Pee Pee Tape really is, supposedly HitlerPig was gifted a couple of underage prostitutes, and he wanted them to pee on the bed that the Obamas slept in when they visited Moscow as president.

Apparently they didn't pee on him, so it isn't that sort of kompromat. It's more him directing the scene, and taking great pleasure in them peeing on a bed that Obama happened to sleep in once. Weird.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you assume it's one or the other. My money is on both. Probably has a whole library to choose from...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

P[aedo] tape

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Mr Trump pledged to end the war on “day one” of his presidency. And as the conflict drags on, the giant question mark hovering over western Europe is how long it will take for the US to make good on its promise.

Why do journalists insist in taking Trump's "promises" seriously in any capacity? An otherwise good article tainted by these two ridiculous fucking sentences. He won't make good on his promise because he is incapable due to being fucking terrified of Putin the thing the fucking article is about.

However, she is equally scathing of European leaders for not coming to terms with this new reality sooner. “The fact that the Europeans are so shocked by his deference to Putin actually shows that they haven’t also done their homework,” she said.

She even literally spells it out later in the article but I guess the journalist wasn't listening.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Should the media not call out politicians when they lie?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mr Trump pledged to end the war on “day one” of his presidency. And as the conflict drags on, the giant question mark hovering over western Europe is how long it will take for the US to make good on its promise.

That's absolutely not calling out a lie. They should call them out when they lie in a much more forceful manner than this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The stupid thing is that the unified West had no reason to fear Putin's hollow threats until Trump started doing everything he can to destroy what makes the West strong. He wants to roll over in front of Russia and make the US Putin's bitch.

The West won't roll over like him though. They'll strengthen their alliances against Russia and will become something far stronger. It just won't involve the US anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I abhor Putin, but he is a legit badass hard motherfucker; whereas Trump is pudding by comparison.

Really, I’m shocked, daily, that so many Americans have rallied around this guy, McRib Bonespurs over here, as their populist “tough guy.” It’s so goddamned weird.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not really a shocker for me tbh, most Americans that I met (and I worked in several US companies so I met some) were insecure loudmouths. Sure some of them were very good at their job but when talking to them they behaved like they invented hot water.

I'm contrast, in my part of the world we have a saying which translated would be "shuts up and does/makes".

Until now Putin did, Trump on the other hand is just making noise.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›