this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
35 points (72.7% liked)

Fediverse

33615 readers
254 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Decentralization is obviously the big thing about the Fediverse but is it TOO decentralized to gain traction?

There is no reason why they have to be fully separate domains in the same branch. You can set up a system of fully independent moderation and extreme levels of customization while having them all on one site with a front page that allows everyone to see whats popular.

A front page wouldn't prevent individual subgroups from requiring approval to join, it wouldn't prevent subgroups from banning those it doesn't want. It doesn't prevent users from blocking subgroups that it doesn't want to see on the front page.

What would be most useful is that now someone could create an account on the Reddit, Twitter, Facebook(?) alternatives and give them access to every community, and then allow each community to set its own rules, and customize its own to be unique while having a unified product to "sell" and get people to move.

Hot take? Blue Sky should be worked with to join the Fediverse as the twitter alternative and Mastodon should work to be the Facebook alternative

TLDR: One front page and general site for Lemmy, Mastodon....and to sign up and see whats popular and then have fully independent subgroups.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

As much as I love the fediverse, its control structures can't scale. If it ever became truly popular, bad actors would overwhelm it almost immediately.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

I, and a lot of other fedizens, don't want the type of people who use BlueSky and Facebook in my ActivityPub fediverse.

Fedi is cool because it's small, weird, and highly enriched with people I'm actually interested in communicating with. I don't need or want the pool to be diluted with an ocean of piss.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hot take? Blue Sky should be worked with to join the Fediverse as the twitter alternative and Mastodon should work to be the Facebook alternative

??? Why should Mastodon become an entirely different kind of site when there's already Facebook alternatives for the fediverse?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What's the Facebook alternative? Also blue sky is by far the closest to replacing Twitter with millions of users

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

Friendica is designed to be a facebook alternative. Not too familiar with it though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Then make the "one true frontpage" for Lemmy or whatever (implement ActivityPub, maybe borrowing some code from the Lemmy codebase itself, or kindof making a fork of Lemmy), and if it's good, it'll be used. If not, it won't.

But then, it might well fall victim to this phenomenon:

XKCD #927: Standards

Lemmy has lots of competing "front pages." How will one more change anything? A more generic domain name or something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Lemmy.com Mastodon.com ... If those were the front pages that curated the top 25 posts and top 25 sub groups in the last 24 hours and it was a space where you could search for the groups you fit into or are interested in. No more confusing mess.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While not being exactly what you are proposing, you could consider mastodon.social and lemmy.world the de facto front page for each service. They are by far the largest and best-known instances in their respective networks. Many new users start at those instances, get their toes wet, and then branch out.

I'm not arguing that's how the network should be structured, though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

For mastadon, it's like 85% mastadon.social, Lemmy has it better with only 50%

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Welcome! Thanks for the suggestion, I'm happy with having multiple sites and not one team having absolute say on content over the rest.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know what's exactly as decentralized as fediverse? Email. Do you know anyone who doesn't use email?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You've just described the goals of Mbin. I congratulate you.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gateways that ease the pain of entrance to the fediverse are a good thing. A single, centralised gateway that defacto controls all access to the fediverse is exactly what I'm trying to get away from

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to be clear each site, Lemmy, Mastodon.... Would have it's own front page under this idea.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most platforms have their "join lemmy" or "join Mastodon" equivalents already

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kinda like the fediverse as is. We keep slowly growing our services. We don't need to be social media.

We can be social sure but without the need to be ever growing. I would rather us concentrate on the people and giving us power rather than huge orgs that are going to do huge org things.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I just like that it's smaller. Like, you can actually have conversations (or slapfights :sigh:) and can actually recognize people. Kind of like something bigger than a small town but smaller than a huge city.

I'm not opposed to growth, and it would definitely be a good thing in the long run, but I like that it's not just shouting into the void here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey,

Hope you're doing well!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

As well as can be expected, all things considered. Hope the same to you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Growth is a long way away, we already lost 30% of the people that first came on board (couldn't stand having to create their own content smh)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Thanks totally agree. And appreciate the comment.

I feel like this is still a community and less people trying to influence. Or less so at least.

Lol slapfight.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Why on Earth would you want it to take over the social media space? Have you not seen what those places are like?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like the current Lemmy, if it grew to be as big as Reddit, would immediately defederate from a large section of Lemmy itself, creating many separate communes rather than the one (or two) we have right now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

There is that advantage.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why in Earth would you want it to take over the social media space?

So that the rest can be free with us.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

But I don't like them and don't want them in my feed.

Mass-market slop troughs exist for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because social media is controlled by big corporations and thats why they are such shit. Once Reddit, Twitter and Facebook falls and if it falls to the fediverse it will be controlled by the average joe not political money motivated operatives

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago

Ah yes. The 'average joe'. :|

load more comments
view more: next ›