this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
262 points (96.5% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump Jr. and MAGAworld pounced on the news of Joe Biden’s cancer diagnosis with wild speculation about a long term “cover-up” of the former president’s disease.

Hours after Biden’s office announced Sunday that he had been diagnosed with a “more aggressive form” of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones, Trump Jr. boosted a conspiracy that was already circulating among MAGA influencers and pundits.

“What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup???” he wrote on X.

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

man, I would pop a bottle of champagne if any of those trump cunts got this diagnosis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That is the stuff that I think makes many MAGA turn on them. Not a full turn. But a lot of good old boys do not fuck around this way. This is pure silver spooned nepo baby rhetoric

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago

no one in the Trump family has a shred of empathy or brains in their head.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

“What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup???”

Does this guy think Jill Biden has a medical degree? Her doctorate is in education. This is yet another case of a MAGAt showing how ignorant he is just by opening his mouth....

(Now that I read the link, it looks like this was Trump Jr, so the ignorance tracks....)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He absolutely knows. The MAGA base don't, and that's what matters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Worse. These are the people who said she's not a doctor because she holds s PhD in education, rather than a medical degree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like maga cunts know the difference between a MD and a PhD.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I kinda want to open fake MAGA doctor offices now and just make them drink bleach or shoot up horse dewormer or whatever for giggles

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

a long term “cover-up” of the former president’s disease.

Once again, every accusation is a confession with these people. Every. Fucking. Time.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If we do then Trump needs to start showing his

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

I'm actually okay not seeing Trump's prostate, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well...

I highly doubt that Jill is keeping a close personal eye on his prostate...

However I think if Gerry Connelly wouldn't have gotten so much blowback for "finding out" he had cancer like the day after the election, I believe this would have been announced earlier.

And I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if they found out while Biden was president and just didn't say anything.

There's a new DNC now, but I wouldn't have trusted the last one on anything

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago

They wouldn't hide something like that.

Anyway, Biden is a sharp, healthy, active young man who is fit to run for president again.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There’s a new DNC now

Huh? Looks an awful lot like the old one to me

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It's been three months now...

They're redoing a vice chair election the old DNC fucked up instead of just picking one

They're openly, publicly, and repeatedly saying they're be impartial and backing that with their actions.

They've been pushing local meetings in areas where local politicians refuse to meet with their constituents...

What more did you want in 3 months of taking over?

Seriously, what will make you feel more comfortable in trusting the new DNC?

What do you want?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (4 children)

They are redoing a vice chair election because one of the vice chairs they picked decided to push for primary challenges to the old guard. And you think that's a sign that the old guard has fallen? That's some Republican level bullshitting right there.

You don't redo an election once the elected people take office - especially for something like the questionable reasons they offered. Trump's election had a stronger basis for being challenged than this, but the Democrats accepted that on this basis.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remove the dinosaurs stuck in old patterns and ways of doing things. Pelosi and Schumer jump immediately to mind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They’re openly, publicly, and repeatedly saying they’re be impartial and backing that with their actions.

Martin isn't going to "go after" anyone.

But he's not going to protect incumbents just because they're incumbents.

It's all progressives need to kick out the dinosaurs, we don't need the party to do it for us, just to not put a gun to our head and say it's a neoliberal or a Republican.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They've said that before. Somehow they always seem to find a way to come to the rescue for an establishment friendly incumbent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They

Who is "they"? The people no longer in power?

Fuck them, you'll never see me defend them.

But it's Ken Martin now, and he didnt just show up 3 months ago fully formed...

We can look at how he ran Minnesota's state party, turned a purple state blue and made it one of the most progressive states in the country.

Because while he isn't overtly progressive, what he cares about is winning elections. And he knows voters want progressive policy and fair primaries.

It's not like he's gonna be our Superman, but after 50+ years of Lex Luther running the party, we really don't need anything more from the party.

A fair primary is all it takes to get neoliberals out of office.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

to be rid of the Democrat and Republican cancer sickening the body of the United States

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So you personally wanted the new head of the DNC to dissolve it?

Ok, that's literally never going to happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anything to distract the base from their rampant criminality and blatant defiance of the rule of law, including the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

The base only cares about law when it's someone they dislike.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›