this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
176 points (99.4% liked)

Asklemmy

47997 readers
863 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 minutes ago

Jurassic World. Just give me 90 minutes of dino mutants fighting, I don't give a shit about Chris Pratt nor some random kids.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

CATS

Cats is not a complicated musical. All they had to do was animate it and get actual voice actors/singers. I've seen sketches for what I think was a Tim Burton sketch, and that would have been a million times better. I don't know who looked at Cat's and was like, "Yup, we need CGI." It looks horrendous and sounds bad more often than not. The musical is already pretty out there, how much more fun would that movie had been if we had animators working on it. The creative visuals, colors, motifs. Not to mention a cat is a wonderfully complex animal to animate just because of how they move. That movie could have been a visual delight in part with the Spiderman movies if they let it, but noooooo. Let's make a nightmare.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The original Purge. I thought all the background stuff and setting were super interesting, but the film itself was a generic home invasion movie. The sequel expanded on all the stuff I was interested in, though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 57 minutes ago

The sequels really explored the idea with impressive worldbuilding. I admit the first one was more a horror flick, but the others were definitely digging deep into social commentary

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago (4 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

100% agree. It's a fine twist on the subgenre, but the twist introduces an idea that begs to be expanded upon as part of a larger, cross-subgenre arc. And yet we only get a sliver and then it's done.

My hot take is that Joss Whedon's writing is like JJ Abrams': perfect premises with bad sense of follow-thru, so all their work gets the Netflix "over before it's satisfyingly concluded" treatment

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 52 minutes ago

Yeah, so much more there, they set up a very good universe to explore a tiny sand grain of it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 58 minutes ago

you shut your bastard mouth!

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hot take.

I loved cabin in the woods!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

everyone and their mother did

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with all the other people in this thread mentioning 'In Time'. It had such a great premise, and I didn't even hate the execution, but it was mediocre. It was like they went 50% of the way to a flawless execution and just said "fuck it, that's good enough". The concept has a lot of elements to explore, like classism, labor exploitation, human rights, even free will to a point... A movie just isn't the right vehicle for that story. It needs to be a series. Done right, you could explore all that while having an overarching plotline, and still have your weekly subplots and B stories. That would give the story time to fully develop the romantic connection between the poor guy who comes into a bunch of time, and the rich girl who empathizes with him. That romance felt incredibly rushed in the movie, but you could build it up over a whole season in a show.

I also want to mention another movie that I'm not sure belongs here. It's not a bad movie, nor do I think the execution was mediocre, but for the life of me I can't figure out why it didn't do better. That movie is called 'Push', with Chris Evans and Dakota Fanning. I just watched it again the other night, and I freaking love it. The concept isn't that amazing or original, but the way they present it is great. There isn't a ton of exposition or world-building. They kinda just drop you in and let you figure it out, and I really like that. Evans and Fanning have great onscreen chemistry, and Djimon Honsou is a perfect bad guy. This is another one where I think it would make a great series, even though I think the movie was done really well. It's just kind of a perfect mid-budget sci-fi action movie, and we don't seem to get those anymore.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 46 minutes ago

Will check out both, thanks for this

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

Timeline! The movie was completely forgettable but the concept was pretty cool. I loved the book.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Madam Web. The premise of your perception being un-stuck in time and the ramifications that has for your psyche is really cool. What's not cool is hiring bad writers and nepo baby actresses to portray that story

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

nepo baby actresses

which ones

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Came here to say this. That movie showed me depths of fear I didn't know I had yet, it could have had better production values.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Eragon.

There is a reason that most fans pretend the film never happened

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

What film? as I look from my bed to my bookshelf with all 4 books

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ