this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
662 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23877 readers
3392 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Read all about it in this month’s riveting issue of Duh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Christmas is going to be awesome.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

To be honest they were super cheap. A Barbie doll or another name brand toy cost the same as the euro store crap this side of the pond. When I visited the states I brought Barbie's and Levi's jeans as souvenirs! Literally the same price as the shitty key rings I bought at the airport.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Americans mostly don't even want to do the manual labor jobs which have always been available in the US, like residential construction or picking crops. And the oligarchs want to both reduce immigration and re-industrialize? It's going to be comically unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Easy: just set up labor camps and put any ”undesirables” there.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

It is cheaper for them to take the sales loss that comes with raising prices rather than it would be to take any other approach. Austerity and Tariffs make the perfect economic shit sandwich.

It doesn’t help that the tariffs are nonsensical. It’s not even like they’re doing austerity with correctly targeted tariffs. Incredible work, masterful gambit, art of the deal they’re saying.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I still think trump is going after all manufacturing, tech and science, so he can control it. It's a very mob thing to do and it's kind of working. All of tech showed up at his inauguration and gave a shit ton of money. I'm willing to guess that manufacturing did too, they're just not household names.

[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Of course it won't. It would take years to move manufacturing to the USA. Building factories, hiring and training workers, none of that can happen over months. It's also a huge expenditure for the business which, along with higher payroll costs, would be passed on to consumers. Costs are going to go up weather they move manufacturing here or not so why not take the path of least resistance and just pass on the tariff costs?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Also, why invest in moving your entire manufacturing side to the US when you can be reasonably sure that the tariff fad will be over in 4 years at minimum, 10 years max?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, there's absolutely no indication that Americans want to be working at poverty wages in an assembly plant. None of this makes sense even if it "worked."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

it’ll. never. happen.

why? because profit is why the corps exist.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And it's not just the assembly factories that are the problem. Why the hell would you create a factory here when your entire supply chain is going to be hit by tariffs anyway. Not only are you still having to increase prices, now you're less competitive than offshore factories due to labor, input, and real estate costs. And why would you move supply chain factories here only for them to have to deal with both the above problems and retaliatory tariffs. The US market isn't worth that for a whole lot of things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 140 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Especially when the US Government changes its mind about tariffs every few minutes. No one can plan major infrastructure changes around that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I imagine Felon Drink Bleach might not be happy with such bold mainstream media news headlines indicating that his key objectives aren't being met.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He is going to tariff Mattel because that's all he knows how to do.

I wonder if he has bothered to figure out what the word tariff means yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he has been obsessed recently with explaining how "beautiful little girls" can just live with fewer dolls :-/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 242 points 1 month ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›