this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1056 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69705 readers
3218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

I'm so glad I quit Facebook long ago and also started using uBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 hours ago (17 children)

Teenagers should not be on social media. I rest my case.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 hours ago

Be aware that the companies would have paid Facebook handsomely to identify users in this way. The world we live in has a sickness with greed for money at its heart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Fucking hell. That is vile!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

How did they come up with this idea? Did the algorithm suggest this pattern, or did someone in marketing come up with it?

[–] [email protected] 120 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Saint Luigi deliver us from villains like Facebook

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

As if there would be no social networking without Zuckerberg.

Like any sin, the change starts with us. If we want a healthy social network, we can build a healthy social network.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 hours ago

Praise the king!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Zuckerberg’s $330 million mega yacht may be tracked here: https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9857511

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Ah right, still in the north sea outside of Norway. Recently there was news of Sami villages being bribed to not put up a fuss when a "prominent person" wanted to go heliskiing, then his yacht arrived on site:

https://www.dn.se/sverige/samebyar-erbjods-ersattning-sedan-anlande-zuckerbergs-lyxfartyg-de-ville-tysta-oss/

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Translation of article from behind paywall:

"The Facebook CEO's enormous yacht has been anchored in a Norwegian fjord near the Swedish border.

Now DN can reveal that several Sami villages have been offered compensation for not saying no to a "prominent person" going on a luxury helicopter skiing trip in the mountains.

  • They wanted to buy our silence, says a representative of a Sami village.

At least three villages were contacted in March by a company that arranges helicopter skiing trips. The Sami villages have been offered compensation, ahead of a very secret group of tourists arriving to ski in the Swedish mountains in April. A Norwegian village team has also received a similar offer.

  • We understood that it was something special. The organizers were very keen for us to say yes, even though this is before the calving season when the ewes are pregnant and all the reindeer are very fragile after a tough winter, says a representative of a Sami village.

Helicopter skiing in untouched lands, known as heliskiing, has been criticized by reindeer owners for destroying nature and disturbing the reindeer – and the issue has been raised by the Norrbotten County Administrative Board to the government.

According to sources from several Sami villages, the plans for this particular April visit were somewhat out of the ordinary.

The Sami villages, which use helicopters in their reindeer husbandry, were offered six hours of helicopter use by the organizer – which corresponds to around 50,000 kronor.

On April 1, one of the largest private luxury yachts in existence arrived in Bodö, Norway – something that caused a stir in the Norwegian media.

It is owned by Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of the Facebook company Meta, who is one of the richest people in the world. He is one of the billionaires who has tried to approach US President Donald Trump by, among other things, donating money.

Zuckerberg's luxury yacht is called Launchpad, and he bought it last year for $330 million. The boat is almost 120 meters long. There is room on board for 26 guests and 42 crew members.

"Among the distinctive features are a private outdoor owner's deck with a jacuzzi, two certified helipads, a swimming pool with a moving floor and a spacious beach club," the manufacturer writes on its website.

Zuckerberg's smaller "supply ship" Wingman, which was included in the purchase of Launchpad, was also seen in Bodö. Wingman is also equipped with a helipad and helicopter.

Both ships then headed north and last week they arrived in a small coastal village, Drag, in northern Norway, where, according to information to DN, a house has been rented in order to, among other things, be able to cook for the guests from the boat.

  • There were several helicopters on site and a hell of a lot of people. A big operation, says a source to DN.

It is from there that the controversial extreme sports event is said to have taken place. Helicopters are said to have traveled across the border to Sweden to drop off guests in the Swedish mountains for skiing on the pristine top snow. According to several sources to DN, the yachts' own helicopters were used. In addition, at least one more from a local entrepreneur.

  • We see them flying from here every day, a source in the Norwegian Drag told DN this weekend.

A businessman in the area who was asked early on to contribute to the event, tells DN that the plan was for the group to come with a large yacht with its own helicopters and that they hired a Swiss organizer as an intermediary:

  • It was the crème de la crème, no ordinary millionaires. They wanted a three-star chef up in the mountains and they would fly their own helicopters and bring their own guides. It felt so unnecessary. It didn't make sense. We said no.

DN has not been able to confirm that Mark Zuckerberg himself was on board any of the ships.

A representative for a company that accepted said to DN before the visit:

– We have a duty of confidentiality when it comes to the customer. But honestly, I don't know who is going to ski. That it is some prominent person possibly, if they can afford to pay for all that. But I have no idea who or what they are. We sell a flight service. We fly a helicopter – it is a logistical solution for this event.

There has been reluctance from Sami villages that you have been in contact with. What do you say about that?

– The Sami villages are very important customers for us too and we have constant contact with them. It is an ongoing dialogue that takes place continuously all the time.

The company does not want to comment on the fact that the event takes place in connection with the calving period.

One of the villages that has been offered compensation is Unna tjerusj Sami village. They have – like the other respondents that DN has spoken to – declined the compensation. Chairwoman Helena Omma:

– My position is no. There is a word in Sami called joavdelaš. It means something like “useless”, things that you do completely unnecessarily. And heliskiing is the definition of joavdelaš, there is no benefit in this, she says.

– It is harmful to the climate, it disturbs reindeer as well as wildlife and nature in the area and I am completely against using nature as a playhouse. Nature has its own value and its own rights. In this case, it is not even the public’s interest in outdoor recreation that is being taken into account – only the richest people have the opportunity to do something like this.

How do you feel about the fact that the arrangement seems to have been carried out despite you and the other Sami villages having said no?

– Then they have asked so that – if we are lucky and we say yes – they can say that they are doing it in cooperation with the Sami villages. So it is only worth something if we are positive, otherwise they ignore what we say.

Both Launchpad and Wingman have crossed the Atlantic to get to the Norwegian ports, with very large climate emissions as a result. When the lifestyle website Luxury Launches in December calculated the emissions of the two ships during the 10 months that Zuckerberg had owned them until then, they concluded that the emissions amounted to over three million liters, equivalent to 52,000 full tanks in a normal-sized car.

– My advice is to respect the sensitive environment you have the privilege of visiting and understand that you have arrived at the planet's "ground zero" when it comes to climate change. The temperature is increasing two to three times faster in the Arctic Circle, which has caused sharp shifts in snow and ice conditions that are blocking reindeer pastures, changing vegetation and causing accelerated melting of all glaciers, Johan Rockström tells DN.

A reindeer herder who wishes to remain anonymous tells DN that it feels ironic that a group of people using private jets, luxury yachts and helicopters are traveling around the world to find the last snow-covered mountains.

– Climate change is clearly visible – it is an extremely snow-poor year and this may lead to having to move the reindeer to the northwest earlier than usual.

After the adventure in the Swedish mountains, Zuckerberg's luxury yachts continue towards Svalbard according to the port's arrival lists.

On Monday, he was in court in Washington DC to defend Meta's purchase of Instagram and Whatsapp, which according to the US Competition and Consumer Protection Authority has created a monopoly.

DN has sought Mark Zuckerberg through Meta's press service.

Criticism of heliskiing for several reasons

At the end of March, Professor Johan Rockström, among others, called for a ban on heliskiing in an opinion article in Expressen, due to high emissions, destruction of sensitive nature and the fact that the activity itself is dangerous.

In March, two men died in an avalanche accident in Abisko during a heliskiing excursion. The organizer is now suspected of causing death to another person, among other things.

Many Sami villages elsewhere are experiencing major problems with heliskiing on their land.

In the areas currently in question, several people DN spoke to say that heliskiing must be said no – regardless of whether there are reindeer in the area at the time or not. The risk, they say, of allowing one operator in is that more will gradually join, who will later run tours where reindeer are present."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 277 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And mass sharing of images/videos which has made it so much easier to connect people, specifically in one case I saw today of someone on Telegram sharing child porn. How do you even put the cat back in the box?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

As little kids we got like no genderbased education from our parents. When we moved our grandmother got a lot more control and dumped blue boyish stuff on my brother and forbid the girly things. Has never worn a dress since and now is still not willing to wear one

(it could be that us older sisters influenced that he wants to wear dresses too)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I need context to understand your story. How old was your brother when you moved? How often was he wearing dresses before the move? How quickly did it stop? And how old is he now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Oh you mean fines? Sure here's some money $$.
Meanwhile AD rev is $$$$$. Just the cost of doing business!
Hahahaa

[–] [email protected] 98 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

💯 Big tech companies think they’re above the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

History has shown that they are.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago

they ARE above the law, at least it would seem so.

[–] [email protected] 109 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If a law has a fine, it was created to deter poor people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

That depends on if it is a dayfine or not.

A fine of €500 for speeding will only really affect poor people, 30 dayfines which value is dictated by the wealth of the individual is a better system.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Who the fuck comes up with this stuff?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

The kind of person whose past probably includes more than a few vivisected animals.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The most generous assumption is that they use statistics to determine correlations like this (e.g., deleted selfies resulted in a high CTR for beauty ads so they made that a part of their algo). The least generous interpretation is exactly what you're thinking: an asshole came up with it because it's logical and effective.

Either way, ethics needs to be a bigger part of the programmers education. And we, as a society, need to make algorithms more transparent (at least social media algorithms). Reddit's trending algorithm used to be open source during the good ole days.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you make the algorithm open source that determined it was ok for you to murder Tuvix tho

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago

JANEWAY DID WHAT SHE HAD TO DO

[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago
if (ugly) {
    kill_child(child_name);
} else {
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
}
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

And tiktok is supposed to be our enemy?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm very skeptical that the Chinese government having your data as an American is worse than the American government and corporations (you know, the people with applicable jurisdiction) having it. Seems more likely to me that American interests just weren't happy about a huge platform of Americans not being under their umbrella of control and censorship. Sure, you could argue that China of course has their own, but the two wouldn't completely overlap, so there were windows where things could be freely and organically discussed and organized by Americans, without American government and corporate interference. Obviously that couldn't be allowed to stand.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

That's very nice and cute that you're skeptical, but they're literally doing the same thing, except with a goal of weakening America instead generating more money.

Your skepticism doesn't matter- it's an attack on you, stop excusing it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Yes there definitely would be an alterior agenda to the reasons for the push to hate on tiktok data fears. But that's not to say that people are any safer (data wise) with US big tech.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago

TikTok absolutely does the same kind of thing and worse. Engagement is all that matters. Doesn't matter what kind, what about, or how that engagement is generated.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

Por que no los dos?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago

both ARE enemies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I agree. I'm addressing the obvious hypocrisy of big tech

[–] [email protected] 75 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Big tech is our enemy. It doesn't matter if it's facebook or tiktok.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 69 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wonder how much of a bonus the sick fuck who pitched that got for the idea?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 12 hours ago

Probably nothing. Most likely, a paid consultant to give ideas. And if it was a worker, they were just doing their job and at most got a "great job, keep up the good work," praise email.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›