this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
590 points (98.7% liked)

World News

46866 readers
3743 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A driver plowed a car into a crowd at a street festival celebrating Filipino heritage in Vancouver on Saturday night, killing at least nine people and injuring others.

Some of those attending the festival helped arrest the suspect at the scene, who police identified as a 30-year-old man.

...

“It’s something you don’t expect to see in your lifetime,” Kris Pangilinan, a Toronto-based journalist, told Canadian public broadcaster CBC. “[The driver] just slammed the pedal down and rammed into hundreds of people. It was like seeing a bowling ball hit — all the bowling pins and all the pins flying up in the air.”

He continued, “It was like a war zone… There were bodies all over the ground.”

(page 3) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

ITT: hillbilly gun-clutchers who don't realize cars are only working when you don't hit something, and guns are only working when you do hit something.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

This is absolutely terrible.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I know it's a slim chance and I'm going out on a limb here, but something tells me the driver was a white conservative.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No motive has been given, although police have said they are “confident” it was not an act of terrorism.

Let me guess? The suspect is white! I jest, but at this point it's probably likely the driver is a radicalized "conservative" than any other group.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 162 points 1 month ago (10 children)

No motive has been given, although police have said they are “confident” it was not an act of terrorism.

I wonder what makes them confident of that. It certainly resembles a terrorist attack.

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you talking about, the victims weren't white?

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It means they double checked and the driver was definitely white

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 36 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Cars are a terrorist threat! We should remove them from our streets.

[–] Eril@feddit.org 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only a good guy with a car can stop a bad guy with a car though. Also if everyone in a crowd had a car, stuff like this wouldn't be possible.

/s for the people in the back

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Conservatives are a terrorist threat

FTFY

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arankays@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (8 children)

"car plows"

So we only call it a murder or a terrorist attack if guns are involved?

We are brainwashed and numb to car violence. Super sad that nothing is done to stop this from happening.

Cars need to go. Away forever.

[–] wetbung@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There are a lot of areas that were designed based on cars. Where I live would be difficult for most of the residents without cars or something similar. The population density is too low to make most public transportation practical.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good news, in those places a driver going off the road isn't going to hit a crowd of people.

[–] wetbung@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I completely agree. If you look at the comment I was responding to, though, you'll see they appear to be advocating a complete prohibition, "Cars need to go. Away forever." I'm just saying there are places where that's not practical.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] arankays@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's because they specifically designed those areas to be car specific to serve the needs of the Nazi Ford corporation. "Population density" is a poor argument.

Just look up pictures of America 100 years ago. Trains. Streetcars. Trams. Buses.

Not fucking highways and urban sprawl.

By all means, live in your little suburb with your car. We just want the cities to be safe from the violence they bring.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Cars need to go, streets need to pedestrianize, and bollards need to go up to make sure cars stay the hell out.

To your point, imagine if this were a mass-shooting and the title were: "Nine people killed after gun shoots into crowd at Vancouver Filipino Festival". "Nine people killed after knife stabs into crowd at Vancouver Filipino Festival." It's so fucking passive as to be sickening. It reminds me of the "Man dies in officer-involved shooting" trope we see in US media because extrajudicial murder by the police is so routine and heavily whitewashed.

The AP gives it the same treatment. The only equivalent I could think of is "Nine people killed after bomb explodes into crowd", and you know why that might be written that way? Because it's not immediately obvious who placed the bomb. This mass-murdering psychopath is in custody; we can say "Nine people killed after man drives into crowd at Vancouver Filipino festival."

Edit: the death toll is now eleven, not nine.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cars are absolutely not the problem here. Yes cars have issues, but using this as an anti-car platform is disgusting and shameful.

This is a growing problem with mental illness, racism, and the right wing. Focus on the problem.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah, the old "this isn't a ~~gun~~ car issue; this is a mental health issue". "You're disgusting for trying to make this ~~mass-shooting~~ mass-ramming about ~~guns~~ cars; this isn't the time(TM)." It's such a shame that the US is the only place in the world with a mental health crisis and that's why first-world gun deaths almost exclusively happen in the US, not in Canada where firearms are heavily reg– checks title Oh wait. It seems like "This isn't an X issue, it's a mental health one" curiously always seems to come back to "I want you to solve this nebulous, prolific, and stochastic issue in lieu of addressing the most immediate, concrete problem by regulating X because I really like my privileged position of being able to use X however and wherever I want and fuck anybody who suffers for or questions that privilege."

Why can't it be both? Car deaths have concrete, meaningful steps we could immediately take (pedestrianizing roads, adding bollards to pedestrian streets, reducing car dependency so fewer people own and drive cars, etc., and that's just for incidents where people intentionally use cars to murder people), but it seems like you happen to prefer ignoring the reality that designing cities around cars is horribly dangerous and dysfunctional. "Cars have issues"? Yeah, try reading the title to see one of them.

It's so obvious this attack was trivial to a point where it's not even settled that it was intentional. You think this man could've killed ~~nine~~ eleven people and injured twenty more with his fists? Seriously?? [Editor's note: they seriously compare it to being armed with fists in a now-removed comment.] Even a knife attack is considerably more difficult, and it has at least some minimum barrier that you need to be in some kind of physical condition to perpetrate one, that there's a minimal chance of escaping the scene, that there's more chance of stopping it early, and that a car attack can be done much more impulsively. Plus there's the matter that regulating cars is massively easier than regulating knives. A goddamn infirm 90-year-old has the capacity to perpetrate this attack. And what would've prevented it completely? A few slabs of concrete or steel that any decent pedestrian street would have. Make psychological and psychiatric care free under Canada's Medicare? Absolutely, do it. Do it right now; why haven't we already? Do I think that'd be as effective at preventing this attack as literally just some slabs on the street? No.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know there is a forest behind these trees right?

And I never said guns weren’t a problem, that’s you talking for me because you have no respect for anyone else’s opinion if it might challenge yours.

If you took the time to do the root cause analysis, you would have a different opinion of the problem. So, you can choose to keep your belief, or educate yourself. I’m guessing you go with the one that delivers the most dopamine.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And I never said guns weren’t a problem, that’s you talking for me because you have no respect for anyone else’s opinion if it might challenge yours.

I hope you're smart enough to understand what an "analogy" is? If not, here you go. "Analogy is a comparison or correspondence between two things (or two groups of things) because of a third element that they are considered to share." Hope that helps, champ. 🥰

[–] GrassCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

posting definitions at someone who appears more educated than yourself is straight middleschool behavior from you.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They clearly weren't educated enough to understand the basic rhetorical device of analogy – that I was comparing excuses for mass-shootings to excuses for car rammings as functionally the same – so I feel pretty secure in posting definitions.

Middle-school behavior for middle-school concepts, I guess?

Edit: sorry, I forgot that they also think this person could've killed ~~nine~~ eleven people and injured twenty with their bare fists, so maybe middle-school behavior was too sophisticated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Root cause analysis. Do it or stay dumb. Adios.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

"gun-involved incident"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments