TheTechnician27

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

I just want to go off-script for a second and say that I'm so fucking happy this meme format has stood the test of time.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's a long read, but it's a damn good one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
  • "We are open."
  • "We open are."
  • "Are we open?"
  • "Are open we?"
  • "Open, we are."
  • "Open are we."

So 2/3 of these permutations actually make sense.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

$20 decillion isn't just more money than exists. The amount of money that exists is a rounding error of a rounding error of a dozen more nested rounding errors compared to $20 decillion. The nominal GDP in 2022 was $100 trillion (and even then, calling this "all the money that exists" is a wonky metric). For comparison, $2 undecillion is only 100x more than $20 decillion. So while looking at this XKCD, just chop off two zeroes from the $2 undecillion figure, and boom.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Iowa gets 6 electoral votes, same as Nevada, for those curious.

Edit: addendum: "wtf"

[–] [email protected] 82 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Jellyfish are cnidarians, a phylum which also includes corals and sea anemones. Jellyfish are a specific lifecycle stage of medusozoans (their own subphylum), while corals and sea anemones are anthozoans (another subphylum of Cnidaria).

So yup, they are polyps before sexual maturity. And you'll find they're more closely related to corals than they are to members of any other phylum.

Edit: I highly recommend that anyone who wants to get lost in the world of marine invertebrates check out WoRMS and then follow along in parallel on Wikipedia as you navigate the tree.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

I'd be more than happy to pin a post about Measure J if you'd like to create one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I would also like to point out – as I know land animals often get all the attention – that Trump wants to dismantle the NOAA. Under the NOAA is the National Ocean Service, and one of their primary tasks is the conservation of the US' coasts and lakes. It's not just the humans and the other land animals who are in grave danger from a Trump administration; it's the trillions of creatures living within and outside of the US' waters. It's every animal except for a select few rich, corrupt, fascist humans who will be placed in danger by a Trump presidency.

1
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I know I'm just some guy, but if you're a vegan in the US, I really can't underscore enough how catastrophic a Trump presidency would be for animal welfare. I imagine the demographic of vegans who are also voting Trump is near-zero, but I can also imagine the demographic of vegans staying home on election day is not insubstantial.

Trump has a history of deregulating factory farms and is comically misinformed about veganism. One of Trump's likely cabinet members is an insane carnist who eats bear corpses. The 2017–2021 Trump administration's environmental policy was (and continues to be) disastrous and likely led to the unnecessary suffering of billions of sentient animals – including the rolling back of the EPA's powers through SCOTUS appointments, heavily deregulating the fossil fuel industry, loosening restrictions on imported "trophies" of endangered animals, removing funding for the protection of endangered species, pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Accords, being a superspreader for FUD about important sources of renewable energy, deregulating animal agriculture, allowing the logging industry to run wild on protected forests, and I could go on.

Will a Harris–Walz administration fix animal agriculture? No. Is it likely it would at least try to make it slightly better? I would say so. Is it absolutely, 100%, beyond a shadow of a doubt going to be better/substantially less bad than a Trump–Vance administration? Yes. Not only that, but a 2025–2029 Trump administration would have much, much fewer checks on their destruction of the environment and of regulations against the abuse of animals than their first administration thanks to their prior dismantling of checks and balances.

Please, on November 5th or if your state is still doing early voting, get out there and keep that cruel bastard out of office, and vote downballot too for politicians who are going to be less hostile to animal welfare than Republicans. Human welfare is animal welfare, and that will be in better (not perfect or even nearly perfect) hands with a Harris administration. But moreover, a Trump presidency would be disastrous for non-human animal welfare both through the deregulation of agriculture and through immense damage to the natural environment. Veganism is the reduction of animal exploitation and cruelty by all means practicable, and that makes it our responsibility as vegans to get out the vote and shut this shit down. Trump has already shown us what he would do once, and we can't let him do that again. It's for the animals, and it's for your fellow human.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Having a 0 as the condition for a ternary operator seems redundant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago

The first letter submitted to the Ouija chain is sacred, and we must respect @[email protected]'s contribution.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trained solely on HowToBasic's emails.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Honestly, in hindsight, the variability was the most fun part of Halloween. Every kid knows they could just as easily ask their parents for $10 and get a bag of candy bars, but it's ultimately the variety of what I could be getting and the unpredictability that made me excited. Was there sometimes weird shit I didn't like? Sure, but probably just as often, there was some weird shit I did like that other kids probably didn't, so I think it evens out. There were definitely kids out there who were jazzed to get black licorice, or there were some parents that were jazzed to get a small treat on the side after a night of escorting their kid(s) around since their kid(s) didn't want it.

I think giving kids weird shit on Halloween as long as it's safe, edible, and reasonably palatable is pretty cool tbh and should be encouraged. Like I still remember one house gave out little baggies of Goldfish crackers, or I think another gave out apple slices. One gave out huge sour candy strips. Like I think the best Halloween is one where there's a foundation of "regular" treats with maybe about 25% oddballs sprinkled in.

 

I know it's slow around here, but zero-effort AI slop can only make this community worse.

 

The other day I learned what a Luther burger is, and I wanted to see if anyone had made a vegan version.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/30725337

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20665840

President Biden on Tuesday announced $2.6 billion in funding to replace all lead pipes in the United States as part of a new EPA rule that will require lead pipes to be identified and replaced within 10 years using the new funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act.

 

Studies have highlighted the association of plant-based diets with a lower risk of multiple urological conditions including prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and nephrolithiasis, as well as benefits for planetary health.

Plant-based diets are associated with numerous benefits that co-promote urological and planetary health.

view more: next ›