this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
102 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22985 readers
3716 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On day 1 of the 2nd term, Trump signed an executive order that asked for a report due 90 days in on additional actions on the southern border. It specifically asked them to write if they thought the Insurrection Act should be invoked.

They aren't going to recommend invoking it. If you heard people concerned about April 20th, this was the report they were talking about

Keep the pressure up. They're starting to feel the pushback. Join the nationwide protests tomorrow April 19th

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So, persistent looming threat then.

Makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

Sounds pretty standard these days.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago

The surest way to get Trump to do something is to tell him don't do it. Now this is in the cards at any time.

Too bad he didn't get killed playing with a electrical outlet as a child.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I’ll believe that on Monday, if it hasn’t been done by then

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

This is surprising as they are total lapdogs, perhaps indeed the pressure worked.

Remember though that trump doesn't need them to invoke the act, but having them mention he should would help with legitimacy.

Fascists also love meanings behind numbers, for example the invasion of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022 both happened on February 24.

April 19 is 250th anniversary of beginning of American Revolution (remember when President of heritage foundation talked about "bloodless revolution (if the left allows it to be)"? April 20 also has some meaning in their hearts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

They’re waiting, biding their time. It’s too soon. But in 3 months it might be a different story.

Imagine there’s a meter and the needle needs to be more than way to begin operation absolute control. Think Palpatine and dissolving the senate.

They are speedrunning it mind, they are not a patient group and they have revealed their hand by accident several times. The Zelenskyy meeting was the first and it did not go well and is likely the reason for the pause. Had there not been such backlash from even with their own party and base, today might look quite different.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

4 20 blaze it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

I can't imagine there's not already a court ready to slap them with an injunction on the grounds that a "foreign invasion" is not a "domestic insurrection".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Columbine, or Hitler's birthday?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago

Translation: We have invented enough bullshit evidence to reasonably justify this.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Should still be ready for the eventuality that he tries to impose martial law, just like what happened in Korea recently

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

yup. they always like to bullshit before they do shit.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

It is not an eventuality, it is a possibility that he tries

Thinking that everything is 100% certain to happen is how we get ourselves too paralyzed to act. We can reduce the odds of many things from happening by showing up and building pressure

Join protests, boycotts, strikes, etc.

EDIT: or maybe I apparently have misunderstood how the word eventuality is supposed to be a synonymy of possibility. My bad on that one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It is not an eventuality, it is a possibility that he tries

That’s literally what “eventuality” means:

eventuality | əˌvɛn(t)ʃəˈwælədi |
noun (plural eventualities)
a possible event or outcome.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Oh hmm, maybe I had just heard people misuse it in the past? Had only heard it being used as a synonym for possibility in the context of "every eventuality" but other times meaning something definitive. Looking it up I see that it's supposed to just always refer to possibility

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Found these two, which seem to cloud the issue. These don't say "possible", the first even says "eventual".

the state or fact of being eventual; contingent character

The coming as a consequence; contingency; also, an event which comes as a consequence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

An eventuality, but not inevitably

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I think people get confused because it sounds so similar to “eventually”—i.e., something bound to occur given enough time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Even if the probability is less than 100% it is a good idea to prepare while there's still time to do so. Its not about paralysis, its about emergency preparedness and taking necessary precautions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Here are some examples that come to mind:

  • Having enough food/water/essentials to make it through 3 days without electricity or gas (like what was recommend in Europe recently)
  • having a plan of how you'll to keep in contact and meet with people you care about if there's no internet or cell service
  • making sure whatever social media you use to voice dissent cannot be easily linked to your identity via email, photos, location data, etc.

Basically the same sort of disaster preparedness you would have normally, except the last bullet point

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This is going to be a tough weekend for Trump. Things aren't going his way on quite a few fronts. Stay wary, everyone. There's always time for another meltdown and it seems the Mad King is done slinging ketchup at the walls.