this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
761 points (98.5% liked)

News

29295 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That’s just wild. The one silver lining to T2 is that I’m not shocked by anything anymore. It’s still outrageous, but the surprise is gone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

All those DOGE savings went to this. They really hate science and anything factual.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

This is a huge waste of money. They should doge it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Regardless of where it actually came from (probably bats) this site is just propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So did it originate in a Wuhan Lab or not? I keep hearing one thing then another.

Not trying to confuse the issue, I legitimately don't know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

At this point, I don't care. It's just something that can be weaponized.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one know because China are not going to admit if it was a lab leak. Also lab leaks doesn't mean the virus is human made. However there are some un-answerd questions. There were scientists spies that got caught with sample from Canadian labs flying to China, and there was some concern about military funding and other few things that support the leak theory. However it is not conclusive evidence. So it stay at the theory level.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There were scientists spies that got caught with sample from Canadian labs flying to China.

I think this fact is coincidence and not covid related in the slightest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

That’s some serious AboveTopSecret bullshit right there.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So the narrative is COVID was a dangerous lab leak - but also, you don't have to wear a mask?

Consistency is not a strong point of these dumbasses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

If they thought clearly, they wouldn't be prime targets for conspiracy theories and propaganda. We're talking about people who can't think rationally.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's pretty standard to play both extremes simultaneously, and people just pick whichever they want to relate to at any given moment.

eg.

  • (such-and-such group) are lazy, but also they are taking all the jobs.
  • They are stupid, but also have secret organisations that control the world, with mind-control, and lasers that control the weather, etc.
  • They are snowflakes obsessed with inclusiveness, but also they want (target-minority-group) to take over.
  • They are against free speech; and we must silence them.

I'm sure others can think of more, and variations on those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just a note: It would have been easier to read your post if you used brackets instead of parentheses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fair call. It didn't occur to me to do that, but I understand why you'd prefer it. Originally I was actually naming the groups; but I changed my mind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

The enemy is both strong and weak.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think there's enough evidence to conclusively say that it was natural or that it was a lab leak. There is actually quite a lot of evidence that it was a lab leak, but this website looks like such BS.

There's also good evidence that Jeanne Calment was not the world's oldest woman, but was instead her mother. Also, it's well-understood that lightbulb manufacturers conspired to lower lifespans of bulbs throughout the 20th century. Just because there was a conspiracy don't mean it ain't real.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The lightbulb cartell existed, but it wasn't like we could have had lightbulbs that would have lasted longer with the same efficiency and light output.

The difference between a conspiracy theory and a conspiracy is that the latter has actual evidence for it. I don't think that's the case for the lab leak "theory".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Here's an analysis of a debate about whether it is or is not a lab leak. There's very compelling arguments on both sides, but I find the lab leak angle to have the most evidence for it.

I think I understand why people assume it can't be a leak -- it sounds like fiction; people have said this about previous events and turned out to be wrong; it would be bad for China if true, so it must be politically motivated. It's okay, you can relax and join me in the ranks of people who are open minded to either outcome.

(Edit: This is a stupid aside, but you define theory as something with no evidence for it, and then put lab leak "theory" in quotes as though you don't think it fits that definition.)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The tall letters in all caps.
The dramatic fade to blue.
Trump standing in the middle.
The fancy font on 𝓒𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭.

Oooh the tackiness is too much to bear

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Like if nothing else this admin has hired a good designer tho

load more comments
view more: next ›