this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
420 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

14251 readers
702 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

Shhhhhh if you're too loud, someone will try to monetize it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Regular time is imaginary! That's what's differentiate time from space. Well assuming it was Minkowski spacetime they were talking about.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago

Come on, this has been a thing for the last 19+12i years

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can have as many dimensions as you want, just keep taking the integral

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can make as many dimensions as you want as long as you clean them up when youre done

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

You can only build one megastructure at a time

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imaginary time are used by a lot of companies in form of your unpaid overtimes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

yhea, but then you get paid in imaginary money

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm still trying to understand perpendicular time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

The obvious interpretation is that it is 0 real time. Safely ignore, I'd say.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

A particle is also a wave, a wave moves back and forth between -X and X passing 0 every time.

Now, when you measure this particle and it happens to be at zero, sometimes it moves towards X afterwards and sometimes it moves towards -X.

For the scientists however, all they can measure is that it's at 0 and half the time it randomly goes one way or the other with 50/50 probability.

To explain this, scientists imagine the particle has more than 0, but it has a secret momentum hidden into it telling it to deflect positively or negatively.

Imagine a circle instead of a line. Now instead of crossing zero, you rotate around 0 and hit a Y and -Y axis with X and -X unchanged.

That y axis that contains the hidden momentum of the particle is called "imaginary" because scientists love loaded terms that are unhelpful to understanding lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Why are they rotating it? I almost understood until you got there

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If you think about a number line, multiplying 2 by -1 takes you to -2. Multiply it again by -1 and its back at 2.

If you think of the arrow from 0 to 2, all you did was rotate that arrow by 180 degrees to point along the negative axis and back again.

Multiplication by -1 is already a rotation of 180 degrees!

All were doing now is extending that concept to 90 degrees by imagining a second line perpendicular to the original number line.

Two 90 degree rotations need to get to -1 to complete the 180 degree rotation we already expect in normal multiplication.

Giving it the symbol i, this means definitionally i * i = -1. It has to because -1 flips us around the other way on the number line.

That means i is the square root of negative 1.

Any values that use i to store information, even time, could be called "imaginary time". Really it's just constantly oscillating between the real and imaginary spaces like a constantly spinning arrow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for this! I think it's the clearest visualization explanation I've ever heard for i

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

waves are related to circles: if you have a line and anchor it at one end, when you rotate it the other end of the line, it draws a circle, but if the paper you're drawing it on moves to one side at a constant speed, you'll get a wave. Alternatively, if you plot where the other end of the line is as time passes (for example, every second or every minute), you'll get a wave. you can do this in reverse too.

it's helpful to convert to circles. from a regular wave, at 0 you don't know if the wave will go up or down without further information. 0 on a circle will correspond to one of two spots, either the very top or the very bottom, and if you know which direction the circle is rotating, you can tell what the related wave will do next.

at least that's my understanding

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The easiest way I can explain it is like this: All the sci-fi geeks in the world are familiar with parallel timelines, right? The idea that there's another RymrgandsDaughter out there living in a world where apes with goatees are the "people" but otherwise pretty much everything else is very similar to how things are for us here and now. But like in perpendicular time, nearly everything is completely different than this current timeline, and yet somehow there's a point within where I, Gooberear, took the time out of my morning to completely make up this explanation from thin air and which has no basis in actual fact or reality. The end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Damn I wanna meet this ape goatee woman now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Something something nineteen ninety eight

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

you can have imaginary anything. just imagine it! i especially like imaginary unicorns

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For clarity, are you imagining imaginary unicorns or just regular non-imaginary unicorns?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

it's actually the square root of a negative unicorn, duh!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh, you can interpretate anti-matter as either matter that has negative energy and travels forward in time, or matter with positive energy that travels backwards in time, and both interpretation are valid under Dirac's equation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think you mean charge not energy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Nope. Anti-matter comes as a negative energy density solution to Dirac's equation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's the guy with the private lake, right?

load more comments
view more: next ›