Shhhhhh if you're too loud, someone will try to monetize it
Science Memes
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !reptiles and [email protected]
Physical Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !self [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Memes
Miscellaneous
Regular time is imaginary! That's what's differentiate time from space. Well assuming it was Minkowski spacetime they were talking about.
Come on, this has been a thing for the last 19+12i years
You can have as many dimensions as you want, just keep taking the integral
You can make as many dimensions as you want as long as you clean them up when youre done
You can only build one megastructure at a time
Imaginary time are used by a lot of companies in form of your unpaid overtimes
yhea, but then you get paid in imaginary money
I'm still trying to understand perpendicular time
The obvious interpretation is that it is 0 real time. Safely ignore, I'd say.
A particle is also a wave, a wave moves back and forth between -X and X passing 0 every time.
Now, when you measure this particle and it happens to be at zero, sometimes it moves towards X afterwards and sometimes it moves towards -X.
For the scientists however, all they can measure is that it's at 0 and half the time it randomly goes one way or the other with 50/50 probability.
To explain this, scientists imagine the particle has more than 0, but it has a secret momentum hidden into it telling it to deflect positively or negatively.
Imagine a circle instead of a line. Now instead of crossing zero, you rotate around 0 and hit a Y and -Y axis with X and -X unchanged.
That y axis that contains the hidden momentum of the particle is called "imaginary" because scientists love loaded terms that are unhelpful to understanding lol.
Why are they rotating it? I almost understood until you got there
If you think about a number line, multiplying 2 by -1 takes you to -2. Multiply it again by -1 and its back at 2.
If you think of the arrow from 0 to 2, all you did was rotate that arrow by 180 degrees to point along the negative axis and back again.
Multiplication by -1 is already a rotation of 180 degrees!
All were doing now is extending that concept to 90 degrees by imagining a second line perpendicular to the original number line.
Two 90 degree rotations need to get to -1 to complete the 180 degree rotation we already expect in normal multiplication.
Giving it the symbol i, this means definitionally i * i = -1. It has to because -1 flips us around the other way on the number line.
That means i is the square root of negative 1.
Any values that use i to store information, even time, could be called "imaginary time". Really it's just constantly oscillating between the real and imaginary spaces like a constantly spinning arrow.
Thanks for this! I think it's the clearest visualization explanation I've ever heard for i
waves are related to circles: if you have a line and anchor it at one end, when you rotate it the other end of the line, it draws a circle, but if the paper you're drawing it on moves to one side at a constant speed, you'll get a wave. Alternatively, if you plot where the other end of the line is as time passes (for example, every second or every minute), you'll get a wave. you can do this in reverse too.
it's helpful to convert to circles. from a regular wave, at 0 you don't know if the wave will go up or down without further information. 0 on a circle will correspond to one of two spots, either the very top or the very bottom, and if you know which direction the circle is rotating, you can tell what the related wave will do next.
at least that's my understanding
The easiest way I can explain it is like this: All the sci-fi geeks in the world are familiar with parallel timelines, right? The idea that there's another RymrgandsDaughter out there living in a world where apes with goatees are the "people" but otherwise pretty much everything else is very similar to how things are for us here and now. But like in perpendicular time, nearly everything is completely different than this current timeline, and yet somehow there's a point within where I, Gooberear, took the time out of my morning to completely make up this explanation from thin air and which has no basis in actual fact or reality. The end.
Damn I wanna meet this ape goatee woman now
Something something nineteen ninety eight
you can have imaginary anything. just imagine it! i especially like imaginary unicorns
For clarity, are you imagining imaginary unicorns or just regular non-imaginary unicorns?
it's actually the square root of a negative unicorn, duh!
Oh, you can interpretate anti-matter as either matter that has negative energy and travels forward in time, or matter with positive energy that travels backwards in time, and both interpretation are valid under Dirac's equation.
I think you mean charge not energy.
Nope. Anti-matter comes as a negative energy density solution to Dirac's equation
Oh, that's the guy with the private lake, right?