this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
515 points (99.6% liked)

Hardware

1786 readers
46 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Synology requires self-branded drives

I've started to categorize enshittification headlines by how many words it takes me to know I won't be dealing with a company again (after reviewing the article for accuracy, of course). This one only took 5 words, and one is a compound. That's pretty efficient.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well I currently own a Synology NAS and it officially will be my last.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Synology's new Plus Series NAS

This isn't surprising. SOHO and middle tier business hardware installs have all kinds of these requirements from support vendors. Synology was sort of an outlier on those that just allowed mixed bag and it provide software calculations on hard drive health.

That they want knowns in their machines isn't surprising. I'm actually surprised it isn't a complete drop in any assurances if you BYOD.

These features in this product aren't home or consumer grade and indicating that it's for the "advance home user" is like saying Arch Linux is the advance MacOS. There's a lot of detail behind that statement that's not being addressed.

It is sad to see them go this route, but I cannot say it comes as a surprise. But honestly, if you're a hobbyist and see yourself using the features in this level of NAS, you're likely skilled enough as is to build your own. And honestly, you'll be happier building your own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago

That’s a big fuck-up.

Hey maybe the Sonos app guy can help them out.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

I don't regret building my home server with Unraid at all. It's great, use any drives, don't even have to be the same sizes.

https://unraid.net/

The pricing is reasonable, but one issue is that they changed their pricing scheme recently to only give a year of updates for all but the costliest license. I was grandfathered in unless I upgrade my license, but it's something to consider.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

That’s a shame. Building your own NAS it’s not that difficult and a valuable learning experience.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 186 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Turns out my next NAS will be a custom after all.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Looks like I'll have to treat my current Synology like I treat my Brother printer. Reverently.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›