this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

3020 readers
66 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

holy fuck, that's intellectually, historically and morally revolting all at the same time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

This artist writes for The Onion and makes sure to go out of the way to be completely absolutely absurd to make sure it’s always abundantly clear that it’s satire. Like so far it’s a satire of satire. Apparently that still catches some people up though lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Demonstration: The final stage of a genocide is the denial that it was a genocide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Europeans caused many genocides in the Americas. That's what books would look like if Hitler had won WW2.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's an, uh, ~~extremely suspect~~ laughably wrong and evil phrasing there, school textbook

Ftfy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Get ready. This is how all school textbooks are going to be from here on out—if they aren’t already. Probably worse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

all school textbooks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Explanation: For those of you who are not aware of European colonial history in the Americas, the First Nations 'agreed' to move only at gunpoint - when, of course, they were not shot outright and agreements eschewed completely. The phrasing here makes it sound much less like ethnic cleansing, when, you know, it was ethnic cleansing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In Canada, they made these agreements to force my people onto small reservations with limited supports, services or funds. Part of my treaty heritage is that we get an annual payment for signing onto the treaty - everyone gets a bit of money every year. When they signed onto the treaty in 1904, they agreed on giving $2 per person every year ...... we still get that $2 every year. Every other historic agreement with the Royal family or international agreement is adjusted to inflation .... but Indian treaties (they're called 'Indian' because that is what the original term was, so it is kept in use when referring to treaties) they all remained the same.

They can adjust agreements made with Europeans to adjust with the times

They don't, won't or can't adjust monetary amounts when it comes to Indian treaties in Canada.

.... but the main reason why they even settled on these treaties in the first place was that it was planned, hoped and encouraged and expedited to have all 'Indians' either die, disappear or become naturalized as just Canadians with no land rights within a few decades .... 100 years ago!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Bank of Canada's inflation calculator only goes back to 1914, and that says $2 CAD from then is worth $54.47 CAD today (39.83 USD, 35.06 EUR) so it does not look like that was any type of good deal back then, nor would it be today even if it increased with the CPI.

Totally shameful what the governments continue to do in regard to native people. It's not like they forget you're there, since I'm guessing they have to approve the payment every time, so it seems to be an active and ongoing choice each time to deliver that slap in the face. Makes it hard to say it was just a mistake in the past but those of us alive now have no responsibility in that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A bit more:

If we're talking about US history, this page would be in reference to Europeans arriving in the 1600s. By that time, the population of North America had been dramatically reduced by foreign disease. For the comparatively small number of foreigners showing up, there kind of already was "room" because of that.

Later on, when the US government was actively relocating people, different groups of people responded in different ways. Some decided it would be best to cooperate. Some decided it would be best to stand their ground and fight. None did these things because they freely "agreed" to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Based on the map and the use of "First Nations," this is a Canadian textbook. I have no doubt this happens (and worse) in American textbooks, though.