this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
623 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's the first step in a wealth tax. In the future a government "wealth assessor" will inventory everything you own or invest in, make an arbitrary determination of how much its "worth", and then set your taxes. Like property tax but a million times more complex and arbitrary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

What there should be is an assests controled cap, no person should have control over more than 1 billion in assets.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Can someone please inform me what is going on ?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Billionaire tears taste like a fine Châteauneuf-du-Pape.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apparently it's not just Billionaires who hate this, but also Russian trolls pretending to be leftists. Who would have guessed the two would be allied?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Billionaires can suck my dick and fuck right off into the sun. This shit has GOT to fucking stop! 100% tax on anything over $200M, and I am being real generous with that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

For any who things the US ha a progressive tax system. It is ever so carefully regressive.

https://youtu.be/kXCGbAv8YPw

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Billionaires should not exist. Honestly, I'd expropriate them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Let them eat shit!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Music to my ears? Oh wait, he could lose the billionaire vote. Like all 100 of them.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago

Problem isn't the billionaire vote, but rather the billionaire dark money being funneled to the other guy instead. Which I'm sure they're all doing anyway, but they could decide to do it more. Which makes it ever more important for grassroots efforts to get the vote out so that we can eat the rich in spite of their efforts to dodge our hungry maws.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

In my dreams, we have a flat tax of 30% over all income beyond 40k per year.

And wouldn’t it be neat if, on the tax return form, there was question:

Where would you like your tax dollars to go: • education • military • foreign aid • welfare programs • don’t care, equally distributed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Flat tax is nice in theory, but it's horribly regressive. 30% would be a nice reduction in taxes for anyone making $230k + or so, while a dramatic increase for anyone under 90k

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

To some degree taxes need to be tied to cost of living. Someone making $70k in rural Texas vs NYC is going to have a very different cost of living and quality of life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This only would help if they would actually pay taxes at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The trick is what to tax when the ultra wealthy base most of their worth on stock.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yah I don't remember the exact steps, but it involves getting loans with the stocks as collateral to avoid showing an income

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

30? Lol, nah man, 50 when it gets to more than 1mil a year.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

How about 100% tax on all income, but everything is free in reasonable amounts. 😉

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Isn't communism the devil or some dumb shit like that? We gotta protect our corporate overlords man, we wouldn't want to live in a dictatorship where a very rich few control the world! /s

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

why do i suddenly have the impression this tax aint coming to pass?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Good, fuck em

[–] [email protected] 207 points 8 months ago

Crying billionaires are a sign of society healing.

A healthy society has zero billionaires.

Let’s go further with these taxes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Biden was cooking with this one. It should be even higher that wealth is stolen.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›