this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
623 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

They (billionaires) should not exist, full stop. If they were actually taxed the way we used to in this country, we wouldn't have these security threats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

“My kids, who are 10, 12 and 14, you could tell them, ‘You know what, when you retire you’re gonna get money at 70, not 65.’” he said. “Do you think they’re gonna care?”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

A few verses the masses. They can suck it up, pull themselves up by their bootstraps, etc.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

Well they got rich taking advantage of the poor. That’s the only way you become a billionaire. I feel nothing towards them.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You have to leave incentives for people who are the ones who are going to create the jobs for all those people trying to climb the ladder.

Oh my god, FUCK OFF

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

b-b-but, nobody will want to do good work if they don't have the extremely weak opportunity to enrich themselves by taking advantage of other's labor!!!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

😭🤌🎻🎶🎵

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Archive link for those that don’t have access.

This is never getting implemented and is just theatre for the masses.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

“I don’t agree with the idea of just singling out people because of how much they have or don’t have,”

That's literally how income tax works, you ignorant slut.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He best start believing in being singled out to pay more taxes because the alternative is being singled out to have his head cut off.

The old old money knew this. Why do the nuveau rich not?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For the same reason the world is trying to pull 1920s fascism round 2. People don't learn from history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Maaaaan people is DUMB

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I wonder if he feels the same about healthcare, housing, food, and clean water. Regardless of how much shit he has, he can live in the same apartment with the same public water and food deserts and a doctor that isn't on his personal staff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

The ones being singled out are poor people and the middle class. The rich get preferential rates, deductions that only apply to them, the ability to have armies of accountants and lawyers to limit their liability, and are far less likely to be audited.

It SHOULD be that all income within different brackets should be taxed the same. The rich only pay more because they have more. We all should be taxed 50% on income over $500,000, it’s just that most of us don’t have any income over that.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Wah wah wah just get into your fkn submarine, we double-checked the bulkhead for you 🫡

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

With no due respect to these whiny fucking billionaires, good and go fuck yourselves for being petulant children.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Good. Rage until you hurt yourself you undeveloped children.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

please don't hurt the children.

load more comments
view more: next ›