this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
202 points (90.1% liked)

News

28609 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It sounds like they did some gene editing to select characteristics the dire wolf supposedly had, as opposed to finding an ancient DNA sample somewhere and working from that. So it's more of a genetic simulation than the real deal right?

Like just because you know of some gene that happens to give people pronounced brow ridges doesn't mean you can bring back the Neanderthal. Or am I not understanding this correctly?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

No, that's exactly it. Framing this story as that they're reviving extinct animals is misleading at best

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

I saw a report that said they'd have Wooly Mammoths by 2028. I'd go to the zoo to see a Wooly Mammoth.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I honestly thought dire wolves were just a made up fantasy species, like owlbears and eagles.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

The kind you're picturing, and the kind they made, are.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

I thought BattleToads were made up, then I saw Marjory Taylor Greene.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

That is a lot of effort put into making a slightly different wolf.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 96 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Here's a better article that isn't as uncritically sensationalist.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/04/de-extinction-company-announces-that-the-dire-wolf-is-back/

tl;dr is that it's basically just a gray wolf with 14 edited genes, most of which are from natural gray wolf populations rather than dire wolf genomes. The result is a gray wolf that's visually similar to a dire wolf, not a dire wolf.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

We gave a wolf diabetes which is pretty dire.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah I was questioning it myself because dire wolves have a kinda different skull morphology compared to modern wolves. They're also quite a bit larger.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Visually similar to a GoT dire wolf. IIRC, actual Aenocyon Dirus probably didn't have a white coat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I just want to try dodo meat

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Probably tastes like chicken...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can't wait to be disemboweled by a velociraptor. What a time to be alive!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

*guts spilling out on to your arms as you try catch them from spilling out on to the floor. your last works being 'fu..king... rad."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

“I think that the best definition of a species is if it looks like that species, if it is acting like that species, if it's filling the role of that species then you've done it," she said.

How does she know what a dire wolf looked like and acted like though? They went extinct 10,000 years ago! I hate this quite frankly . Unethical, wasteful, and they’re not even dire wolves!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it’s interesting and worthwhile research but I agree with you that they’re overhyping this and it leaves a lot to be desired. To make real dire wolves at minimum we would need much more complete DNA, and maybe more beyond that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This was unethical research though. They basically tweaked a few things in a wolf without regard to quality of life.

And the changes are so superficial that it reminds me of a gimmick to raise more money; I actually looked for references to crypto and block chain, in case they went there too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why would a few tweaks negatively affect their quality of life? I completely agree the marketing is scummy and a gimmick but it is the next step in this type of research, if you ignore the spin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Physically, hips. Bane of larger wolves. Then we have how that new fur changes their comfort and heat regulation . It’s more than cosmetic: hundreds of variables

Then there is psychology: how all this affects their feelings, how it affects other wolves interacting with them.

Notice the pups are bottle fed: lack of maternal care. Having taken in many dogs, I know that really is important. Then, finally isolation.

Given how the press release and non peer reviewed paper overhypes. I’m not sure if I would want these people to be my vet, never mind dna tinkers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe you are right. The lack of transparency is the most concerning to me and in that situation maybe it’s best not to assume that the changes are benign. It’s up to them to prove they are, which so far they haven’t done.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

There are lots of people complaining about the ethics... But, but, baby woof!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Damn it No I've had enough winter already

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Very interesting, but I would hesitate to call it true de-extinction because there’s no way to know what we don’t know. We don’t know what was in the parts of the DNA we don’t have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We have the full genome...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Shapiro’s team had to extract more dire wolf DNA from two existing fossils to better sequence the animal's genome. From there, Colossal elected to use a close relative of the dire wolf as the base.

"We've taken a gray wolf genome, a gray wolf cell. which is already genetically 99.5% identical to dire wolves because they're very closely related," Shapiro said. "And we've edited those cells at multiple places in its DNA sequence to contain the dire wolf version of the DNA."

Looks like they... almost had it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

They just spliced in frog DNA to fill some of the gaps.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"We've taken a gray wolf genome, a gray wolf cell. which is already genetically 99.5% identical to dire wolves because they're very closely related," Shapiro said. "And we've edited those cells at multiple places in its DNA sequence to contain the dire wolf version of the DNA."

My understanding is that that they identified genes associated with 20 key characteristics of direwolves, and edited those genes in the grey wolf genome. I guarantee that there are likely thousands of direwolf genes that they overlooked, so technically they didn't create a direwolf. They created a grey wolf that looks like a direwolf.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

So…the proper correction turned out to be much less dire.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Make them hyper intelligent and give them thumbs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

or you make them packminds and give them long necks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also, don't forget to hit them with a stick periodically so they learn their place. They might develop a deep hatred for humans but that's okay, it's not like they'll revolt and kill us all or anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

No! They’ll hate the sticks, man! Like, it’s the anti-fetch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Wait, I've seen this movie! Everyone dies...

Edit: seriously... *dies

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

….does, what? Kung fu fight? Are those kicks fast as lightning?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Great ... a wolf that's twice the size of a normal one .... while we're at, let's put a machine gun on it ... or maybe a lazer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

More to snuggle.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

this but two lasers or machine guns.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Leave room for the saddle

load more comments
view more: next ›