this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
424 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22634 readers
3355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure you'll be fine and it'll be even better when the system is rewritten in a month, you won't be lost or declared dead.

Just sit back and enjoy what you voted for.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Republicans back in the day: Social Security is going to collapse! We need to fix it. Not enough money for Americans when they retire.

Republicans now: Fuck Social Security! The Billionaires told us to collapse it. They informed us we don’t need it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Oh no!! Anyways…

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I’m less worried about the closure of offices than Musk thinking he can modernize the SSA administration’s computer systems in 3 months. None of his lackeys have ever worked on anything of this scale/complexity and I’m pretty sure none of them know COBOL since they’re apparently mostly around 25. (And retired COBOL experts likely don’t know more modern languages well enough to translate.)

Don’t get me wrong, the public and private sectors should modernize aging, critical systems that use code written in languages almost no one under 60 has learned, much less mastered. But 3 months probably isn’t even enough time to get through the planning and hiring stage of a project like this. If it were cheap and easy to update those systems, it’d have been done already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

How hard can it be? Import user list from DB, implement the calculate_pension method, integrate with paypall to send the money and you're done. 1 month of work, 1 month for testing and 1 month to celebrate success.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

and one of them is a son/daughter of a KGB agent too.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

It’s a planned disabling of ss.

The trepidation of news sources, or even most social media, to call it deliberate sabotage, gives them cover.

The majority of the American public does not deal at all with this level of tech. And the small percentage of people who understand can not influence anything.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago

The goal is to break it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Also, I think we are about to watch fElon and his child prodigies Whiz on the Electric Chesterton Fence to mix up two metaphors....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja7RvepzC38

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Even if you had the very best experts that knew COBOL and some "modern" language, along with all the right competent supporting staff (documentation, analysts, qa, ops) AND they had skilled, experienced and competent management overseeing it, doing something like that in months is just probably very, very difficult, if not impossible.

If you look back over the respected literature (which means sidestep the hot-take Youtube techfluencers going gaga over rather pedestrian things in languages and tools and frameworks and so on - these dingalings are typically so far up their own rear-ends and likely to just make the same old mistakes already documented in books like Mythical Man-Month and many probably won't read it because they think it's about older systems, therefore irrelevant.) I doubt you'd find much support for a claim that it could be done.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Surprised no one has put the "Have the day you voted for 🌈" image up yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Moneywise. There are like 5 or 6 links to it in the text, starting from halfway down the "article," and it starts to get really blatant when it starts talking directly to you, the reader. I wouldn't be surprised if the entire thing was written by AI.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh weird. I can't get it to load fully so I can't tell, but I don't doubt it. I was just curious what company would possibly want their product associated with this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The framing is really gross as well. Facing a future without Social Security? Try saving for retirement with Moneywise...

They just don't say the company directly in the calls to action because it's likely intended mainly to boost their search engine rankings. Hence the number of links...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yea, I didn't bother to futz with my settings to make it load, but just based off the headline I couldn't imagine it being a paid article, but that tracks honestly. These people have no sense of decency or propriety. What happened to tact and shame lol. It's gross.

load more comments
view more: next ›