this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
126 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He should have focused on American Samoa.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I am focused on my Samoas too, my cookie order just came in

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Yeah, he couldn't crack 10% and in most cases couldn't even hit 5%, regularly losing to "Uncommitted."

Time to go!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m pleasantly surprised this jackass actually endorsed Biden.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What is this, an election for blobfish?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He looks like a Great Value™ Ron DeSantis.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Aww maaaan I thought something was a bit off with the Ron DeSantis I ordered on Wish…

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which is unfortunately is still a better look than the 80yr old alternatives that couldn’t get hired as a greeter at Walmart, home of the Great Value™

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that horrible jackass. He might have good ideas on paper, but he was a miserable "candidate" whose only potential was to muddy up a shit show, and he couldn't even manage that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

lol it’s all miserable candidates around. Neither front runner (D or R) would get hired to manage a local McDonald's, but are the made choices to manage a ‘major’ country. If Biden can’t easily beat Trump, maybe the problem is the choices being presented and not voters looking for alternative.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

But seriously, only he nose the true reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota has suspended his campaign for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination, ending his long-shot bid for the White House.

"I'm going to suspend my campaign and I will be, right now, endorsing President Biden because the choices are so clear," he said in a Minnesota radio interview on WCCO’s “The Chad Hartman Show.”

The three-term congressman said he had to run against the leader of his party because he argued Biden would lose to former President Donald Trump in the general election in November.

Speaking to NBC’s “Meet the Press” soon after, Phillips said, “Right now, if this election was held today, President Biden would lose, and it is an existential threat to the future of the United States of America.

His decision to drop out comes after he announced in November that he wouldn’t run for re-election to his House seat representing Minnesota’s 3rd Congressional District.

In the days leading up to the primary, Phillips spent time campaigning in New Hampshire, including in Nashua on Saturday, where he said Biden shouldn’t be running again — especially because he’s 81 years old.


The original article contains 624 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!