this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
528 points (97.7% liked)

News

23167 readers
2753 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sheriff Ruben Nolasco won re-election despite pressure from victims’ families to step down and a Justice Department report finding ‘cascading’ failures among the law enforcement response that day

For nearly two years, a Texas county sheriff has refused to step down after a gunman killed 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in 2022.

Instead, on Super Tuesday, Uvalde County sheriff Ruben Nolasco faced voters for the first time in the wake of the massacre.

And he won re-election with roughly 39 per cent of votes against three Republican challengers, according to preliminary results.

The sheriff has repeatedly rebuffed calls to resign or withdraw his candidacy for re-election despite overwhelming public pressure from victims’ families, demands that he face criminal charges, and a federal investigation that detailed a minute-by-minute timeline exposing “cascading” failures in the law enforcement response that day.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Always Mess with Texas

Please Tread on me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Conservatives gotta conserve.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Republicans care about kids SO MUCH that they'll HAPPILY REELECT someone who allowed 19 Schoolchildren to be GUNNED DOWN!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I heard his campaign slogan was, "Make Fargo Real."

[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why are positions like Sheriff and Coroner elected? Shouldn't they be appointed/hired based on ACTUAL FUCKING QUALIFICATIONS and experience?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Many counties the sheriff is the primary elected official. They are generally the local executive, outside of cities that are largely enough to need a more formal government.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

It makes them independent of the mayor, who appoints the police chief and is effectively in control of the police department (if the chief doesn't cooperate with them they'll appoint a new one). The mayor is just as likely to be corrupt as the sheriff, so having 2 separate law enforcement agencies that are able to investigate each other seems like a good idea. In an ideal situation they'd keep each other honest.

Checks and balances...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly, basically no one has any checks on sheriffs. We can "vote them out" but that's extremely difficult, and sheriffs can interfere with they're competitors with no consequences.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

The police department can investigate them. Do you think there are more checks on the mayor?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do coroner run anyways? Like...what are their platforms?

I promise to provide accurate information about the cause of death.

Yeah, me too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They rarely run opposed. But if they do I assume it’s based on qualifications or local trust.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Same with coroner. Let's say you have a corrupt mayor and corrupt police department that would really like it if the coroner reported some deaths to be suicide or of natural causes.

But when everyone is in the same political party and colluding anyways, it doesn't really work.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because they are left over from the 1800's and people are too stupid to fix it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Not stupid, just they know they can use the shitty system to their advantage.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What happens when a system that only works with an educated, engaged, and intellectually honest population starts attacking education, engagement, and honesty?

Good things, surely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

In this case I think it's more the indifference of voters without children or sympathy to those who do don't care as long as they aren't affected.

load more comments
view more: next ›