this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
841 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

67002 readers
3791 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Meanwhile a huge chunk of the software industry is now heavily using this "dead end" technology πŸ‘€

I work in a pretty massive tech company (think, the type that frequently acquires other smaller ones and absorbs them)

Everyone I know here is using it. A lot.

However my company also has tonnes of dedicated sessions and paid time to instruct it's employees on how to use it well, and to get good value out of it, abd the pitfalls it can have

So yeah turns out if you teach your employees how to use a tool, they start using it.

I'd say LLMs have made me about 3x as efficient or so at my job.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Technology in most cases progresses on a logarithmic scale when innovation isn't prioritized. We've basically reached the plateau of what LLMs can currently do without a breakthrough. They could absorb all the information on the internet and not even come close to what they say it is. These days we're in the "bells and whistles" phase where they add unnecessary bullshit to make it seem new like adding 5 cameras to a phone or adding touchscreens to cars. Things that make something seem fancy by slapping buzzwords and features nobody needs without needing to actually change anything but bump up the price.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Worst case scenario, I don't think money spent on supercomputers is the worst way to spend money. That in itself has brought chip design and development forward. Not to mention ai is already invaluable with a lot of science research. Invaluable!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Take a car that's stuck in reverse, slap a 454 Chevy big block in it. You'll have a car that still drives the wrong way; but faster.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I liked generative AI more when it was just a funny novelty and not being advertised to everyone under the false pretenses of being smart and useful. Its architecture is incompatible with actual intelligence, and anyone who thinks otherwise is just fooling themselves. (It does make an alright autocomplete though).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

The peak of AI for me was generating images Muppet versions of the Breaking Bad cast; it's been downhill since.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imo our current version of ai are too generalized, we add so much information into the ai to make them good at everything it all mixes together into a single grey halucinating slop that the ai ends up being good at nothing.

We need to find ways to specialize ai and give said ai a more consistent and concrete personality to move forward.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We already did this like a year ago mate. That was like v3 of gpt

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Imo to make an ai that is truly good at everything we need to have multiple ai all designed to do something different all working together (like the human brain works) instead of making every single ai a personality-less sludge of jack of all trades master of none

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

They did that awhile ago, it was a big feature if gpt 3

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Mixture of experts is the future of AI. Breakthroughs won't come from bigger models, it'll come from better coordinated conversations between models.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Its not a dead end if you replace all big name search engines with this. Then slowly replace real results with your own. Then it accomplishes something.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Optimizing AI performance by β€œscaling” is lazy and wasteful.

Reminds me of back in the early 2000s when someone would say don’t worry about performance, GHz will always go up.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thing is, same as with GHz, you have to do it as much as you can until the gains get too small. You do that, then you move on to the next optimization. Like ai has and is now optimizing test time compute, token quality, and other areas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They're throwing billions upon billions into a technology with extremely limited use cases and a novelty, at best. My god, even drones fared better in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I mean it's pretty clear they're desperate to cut human workers out of the picture so they don't have to pay employees that need things like emotional support, food, and sleep.

They want a workslave that never demands better conditions, that's it. That's the play. Period.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

If this is their way of making AI, with brute forcing the technology without innovation, AI will probably cost more for these companies to maintain infrastructure than just hiring people. These AI companies are already not making a lot of money for how much they cost to maintain. And unless they charge companies millions of dollars just to be able to use their services they will never make a profit. And since companies are trying to use AI to replace the millions they spend on employees it seems kinda pointless if they aren't willing to prioritize efficiency.

It's basically the same argument they have with people. They don't wanna treat people like actual humans because it costs too much, yet letting them love happy lives makes them more efficient workers. Whereas now they don't want to spend money to make AI more efficient, yet increasing efficiency would make them less expensive to run. It's the never ending cycle of cutting corners only to eventually make less money than you would have if you did things the right way.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely. It's maddening that I've had to go from "maybe we should make society better somewhat" in my twenties to "if we're gonna do capitalism, can we do it how it actually works instead of doing it stupid?" in my forties.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί