this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
391 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

66831 readers
4773 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Good let them waste all their money

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Current big tech is going to keeping pushing limits and have SM influencers/youtubers market and their consumers picking up the R&D bill. Emotionally I want to say stop innovating but really cut your speed by 75%. We are going to witness an era of optimization and efficiency. Most users just need a Pi 5 16gb, Intel NUC or an Apple air base models. Those are easy 7-10 year computers. No need to rush and get latest and greatest. I’m talking about everything computing in general. One point gaming,more people are waking up realizing they don’t need every new GPU, studios are burnt out, IPs are dying due to no lingering core base to keep franchise up float and consumers can't keep opening their wallets. Hence studios like square enix going to start support all platforms and not do late stage capitalism with going with their own launcher with a store. It’s over.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I like my project manager, they find me work, ask how I'm doing and talk straight.

It's when the CEO/CTO/CFO speaks where my eyes glaze over, my mouth sags, and I bounce my neck at prompted intervals as my brain retreats into itself as it frantically tosses words and phrases into the meaning grinder and cranks the wheel, only for nothing to come out of it time and time again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

Right, that sweet spot between too less stimuli so your brain just wants to sleep or run away and enough stimuli so you can't just zone out (or sleep).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

There are some nice things I have done with AI tools, but I do have to wonder if the amount of money poured into it justifies the result.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The cope on this site is so bad sometimes. AI is already revolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Ya about as revolutionary as my left nut

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That may be true technologically. But if the economics don't add up it's a bubble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's neither, and business majors shouldn't have voting rights as non-sapient humans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Not that I like it. It's just how it is.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The actual survey result:

Asked whether "scaling up" current AI approaches could lead to achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), or a general purpose AI that matches or surpasses human cognition, an overwhelming 76 percent of respondents said it was "unlikely" or "very unlikely" to succeed. 

So they're not saying the entire industry is a dead end, or even that the newest phase is. They're just saying they don't think this current technology will make AGI when scaled. I think most people agree, including the investors pouring billions into this. They arent betting this will turn to agi, they're betting that they have some application for the current ai. Are some of those applications dead ends, most definitely, are some of them revolutionary, maybe

Thus would be like asking a researcher in the 90s that if they scaled up the bandwidth and computing power of the average internet user would we see a vastly connected media sharing network, they'd probably say no. It took more than a decade of software, cultural and societal development to discover the applications for the internet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's becoming clear from the data that more error correction needs exponentially more data. I suspect that pretty soon we will realize that what's been built is a glorified homework cheater and a better search engine.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 hours ago

what's been built is a glorified homework cheater and an ~~better~~ unreliable search engine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I agree that it's editorialized compared to the very neutral way the survey puts it. That said, I think you also have to take into account how AI has been marketed by the industry.

They have been claiming AGI is right around the corner pretty much since chatGPT first came to market. It's often implied (e.g. you'll be able to replace workers with this) or they are more vague on timeline (e.g. OpenAI saying they believe their research will eventually lead to AGI).

With that context I think it's fair to editorialize to this being a dead-end, because even with billions of dollars being poured into this, they won't be able to deliver AGI on the timeline they are promising.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

AI isn't going to figure out what a customer wants when the customer doesn't know what they want.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

It's because customers don't want it or care for it, it's only the corporations themselves are obsessed with it

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Me and my 5.000 closest friends don't like that the website and their 1.300 partners all need my data.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Why so many sig figs for 5 and 1.3 though?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Some parts of the world (mostly Europe, I think) use dots instead of commas for displaying thousands. For example, 5.000 is 5,000 and 1.300 is 1,300

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes. It's the normal Thousands-separator notation in Germany for example.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But usually you don't put three 000 because that becomes a hint of thousand.

Like 2.50 is 2€50 but 2.500 is 2500€

Is there an ISO standard for this stuff?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

No, 2,50€ is 2€ and 50ct, 2.50€ is wrong in this system. 2,500€ is also wrong (for currency, where you only care for two digits after the comma), 2.500€ is 2500€

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

We (in Europe) probably should be thankful that you are not using feet as thousands-separator over there in the USA... Or maybe separate after each 2nd digit, because why not... ;)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

It makes sense from typographical standpoint, the comma is the larger symbol and thus harder to overlook, especially in small fonts or messy handwriting

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Says the country where every science textbook is half science half conversion tables.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I knew the context, was just being cheesy. :-D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Too late... You started a war in the comments. I'll proudly fight for my country's way to separate numbers!!! :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›