this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
255 points (99.6% liked)

politics

22015 readers
3872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

An internal Social Security Administration memo from March 13 reveals plans to require internet identity verification for phone benefit claims, forcing those unable to use online systems to visit physical offices.

The memo, authored by acting Deputy Commissioner Doris Diaz, estimates 75,000-85,000 people would need in-person visits despite month-long wait times and office closures.

This change would severely impact the 40% of beneficiaries who rely on phone service.

Meanwhile, the agency is cutting 7,000 employees (12% of staff) and closing offices. The memo acknowledges these changes will cause "service disruption," "operational strain," and "budget shortfalls."

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

First things first - the irony that boomers and the poor in red states are the ones to be most impacted by this. So, good for them for getting exactly what they voted for. Congrats! The system worked for them! I hope the coming cratering of their financial worlds.

Now, some perspective. My first client as a young federal consultant was SSA. My project was to transition all of SSA’s call centers from old analog phones to VoIP phones. At that time there were something like 36 call centers from Guam to the east coast providing almost continuous phone support to every American citizen calling in.

And you know what? It’s not just SSA they serve. They also answer and serve Medicare and Medicaid callers needing help. Think it’s just a phone agent in India? You had to be an American citizen, get the job, and then go to 13 weeks of training to handle multiple systems and agency policies. Then, if you got through that, they would sit you as a probie with an experienced agent and then if you passed that, then you were a full time agent.

At the time that we delivered our project, SSA handled upwards of 1 billion calls a year from the American public. There is no system in the world that can replace the people it takes to run that. No amount of AI can work a JAWS terminal. What does that matter? JAWS is assistive reading software for terminals. Ever see someone who is legally blind navigate a system tree and help someone file a death benefit completely by themselves with the caller being none the wiser? I have, and that’s because SSA had a strong mandate to hire employees with disabilities. They even had an entire office dedicated to it. We had agents that were legally blind, deaf, and in one case both. But with assistive technology, so much is possible. Now you eliminate the job that a disabled citizen could do and you cut their benefits and leave them out in the cold on their own? Yeah, that’s this regime for you.

The largest teleservice centers employed over 1000 agents. What will you tell the 1000+ agents who worked in the Birmingham, AL TSC besides “You’re fired”? I'm not sure if anyone has paid attention, but it’s not like the American South has been a hotbed of economic resilience - and now you’re going to spike it with 1000 newly unemployed folks, so have fun with that in this economy and job market.

It’s easy to call trump and elon idiots. They are. They are textbook examples of what syphillis and ketamine do to the brain. But to say they’re just creating a bunch of new unemployment cases is underselling it. They are destroying a service that literally every American calls at some point in their lives, either for themselves or for a loved one (like reporting or starting a death benefit).

They’re too stupid and arrogant to understand the live wire that social security is, for better or for worse. When people stop receiving checks they rely on for food, don’t have any assistance with extortionist healthcare, and can’t get any help with identity theft, maybe they’ll realize how bad this really is

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Look, the majority of old fuckers of my generation who are going to be on social security are people who votes consistently in every election for Republicans so I'm just going to be okay with the collateral damage at this point.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

once these assholes are dead by whatever means necessary, we can solve the whole Social Security problem (and many others) by restoring top marginal rates to the levels that built a strong safety net and prevented runaway wealth accumulation in the 1%

during WWII the wealthiest paid between 80-95%. from the New Deal until Reagan destroyed the country in the 80s, top rates were well above 50 percent.

Taxing the ultra rich is how America funded higher education, built the highway system, funded social welfare, uplifted 2 generations, built a global manufacturing and technology economy, and created a prosperous middle class. we did it by keeping oligarchs in check. in a strictly enforced progressively tiered system, top marginal tax prevents the obscene accumulation of wealth

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really really want to see how this would play out. If we're going to go down let's at least see the republicans who voted for this go down with us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean if democracy is restored by pissed off octogenarians I'm in.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago

“It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!” 🏆