Yeah that's obvious by talking to them
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
121 points (97.6% liked)
Science
4007 readers
201 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
So tuxedos and ball gowns are required now?
ETA: The more I think about this, I’m down with having a sex tiara.
no funny business until i put on the sex hat
I agree that we should discourage casual sex.
We should only encouraged ranked competitive sex, otherwise you end up matched with people outside your MMR.
OK but sometimes I want to have a lazy fuck and don't want to have to smurf
Without casual sex how do you think people arw going to find they can compete in competitive sex? Casual sexers go to amateur leagues and get recruited for competitive and professional leagues.
Although at what rank do you actively have to meet it up? B, A, S?
Yes
I meant the ranking, not certain body parts hahaha.
It's more like men can have all the sex they want, women can only have sex to create more babies.
But no gay sex though, that's strictly not allowed.
Unless it's with two women, because that's totally hot.
Bur only if they're conventionally attractive and open to men fetishizing them
Have we considered that maybe they just want a ranked competitive sex league?
A study was needed for this?
yes, to make clarity
„It is scientifically proven that you’re so salty because I’m getting some” is a line that you’re now allowed to use.
As someone who isn't getting any, but isn't actually salty about it (because effort), thinks pro-life is a universally stupid movement, and still doesn't understand why the fuck it matters who does and doesnt have casual sex
It's 100% because they ain't getting any and they jelly