But I'm still not allowed to touch my cellphone while behind the wheel because the screen is too distracting, right?
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1169 points (99.4% liked)
Not The Onion
14918 readers
1425 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Welp every manufacturer that shows this should go down immediately upon first offense.
Not even kidding, this should be corporate suicide.
Dodge and Jeep are (well Jeep already was tbh) both firmly on the "actively speak out against" list. If I was in a place of hugely inflated power, I would dismantle the entire company, and sell it to whoever that company likes the least.
This should honestly be a brand ending scenario in less than 5 seconds after the first ad. CEO should be in the bread line TODAY from getting hit with this.
ABSOLUTE zero tolerance. There are no valid arguments against this and I will die on this hill.
load more comments
(11 replies)
We need to tally up all the accidents and pedestrian hit-and-runs that occur involving cars with this “feature.” It would likely be enough of an increase you could reasonably make a class action lawsuit. I have no sympathy whatsoever for a car manufacturer that can’t get it through their heads that distracted driving is a major cause of accidents, and could easily happen by their own features.
That's the grim truth, isn't it
load more comments
(1 replies)
So... um... will the buyer get money from Dodge to drive this shit then?
You mean the "oopsie poopsie it's just a glitch nothing to see here" thing that was happening to jeeps a little while ago?
Color me shocked
I'd quit my job and start running the campaign for anyone who's willing to run on outlawing this shit. I'd work 75 hour weeks handing out fliers about distracted driving.
Stop buying new cars until they remove this bullshit. We can go 40 years with existing cars without buying a single new one.
The cost of used cars isn't much better assuming you don't want a piece of crap. After almost being killed by 2 used cars I'd prefer to not risk it anymore.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
If you've bought any Stellantis Fiat Chrysler Dodge Jeep etc. product in the last 20 years then you deserve this. Absolute junk.
My 2006 dodge says I do not deserve this.
I bought a Pacifica plug in hybrid because I wanted electric and needed a minivan for my 3 kids. Worst decision ever.
Well, that's truly horrible, but at least it can distract you from the fact you are in a car like that for some reason. Unless it's an ad for the a newer model.
This is why I'd rather rebuild my 30 year old civic's engine than buy a new car.
That seems like a lot of hassle if you're then going to buy a new car anyway.
Why would i be buying a new car anyways? I don't want one, the newest car I'm even interested in purchasing in the future is over a decade old. I just drive my wife's car when I work on mine.
He was making fun of a light grammatical error in your post.
You said 'I'd rather rebuild the engine then buy a new car'
What you meant was 'I'd rather rebuild the engine than buy a new car.'
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Before starting the engine please watch this 30 second unskippable ad
Saying "before x" and giving the amount of time kinda implies unskippable.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Exactly why I wont buy any vehicle with any sort of network connection outside of the CANbus.