this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
592 points (95.7% liked)

politics

21894 readers
2962 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Secretary of State Marco Rubio grew visibly frustrated during an ABC News interview when questioned about the Trump administration’s approach to Russia.

Defending Trump’s push for peace talks with Putin, Rubio insisted negotiations were necessary but admitted the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

He clashed with host George Stephanopoulos over Trump’s refusal to call Putin a dictator and the U.S. siding with Russia in a recent UN vote.

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

We're not placating Putin, we're actively realigning ourselves with him. He is our ally in the Moscow-Maralago Axis of Evil.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

having the intelligence to realize, but not have the balls to speak out to the fact that the Russian Mafia just regulatory captured your country is something to melt down over.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

The U.S. isn't placating Putin. The Republican party is. Because they're traitors.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah Biden placated netanyahu. It was bad, but for the lowest of bars, he at least was placating an ally instead of giving a hostile power everything they want and yelling at the ally they invaded

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And placating Netanyahu and is better than finishing off that genocide with a nice ethnic cleansing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but holy fuck I'm exhausted at the bar being that fucking low

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

This guy sucking putin's asshole says what?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a European, only the complete collapse of the Russian federation in an acceptable outcome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would be the best way for that to happen? More specifically, how can we pull this off safely?

We have very little historical precedent to go on. The USSR collapsed in 1991. There was some nervousness around what was going to happen with all their nukes. Ultimately, we ended up with Russia, led by Putin.

How would we stop Putin from triggering nuclear retaliation?
If we stop that, how do we make sure some other oligarch doesn't immediately take his place?
If Russia were to completely collapse, what would happen to Russia? Would we be willing to let China take over? If not would we be willing to maintain an indefinite occupation of Russia?

There may be good answers to all of these questions. It seems the more practical solution is to contain Russia. Do you think the EU would be ready to adopt a constitution if it came up again?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Russian federal subjects would semi-autonomously be their own countries. Falling under supervision of the UN and neighbouring countries

But that is on the US and China agreeing to it when currently both are against that

It does give China potentially direct control over some resources they would want but they already can get those without weakening their position

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can see why this would be a good outcome for Europe.

It essentially turns Russia into a puppet state. If we were to eliminate China and the US, that would make Russia Europe's puppet state. While it has some obvious advantages to Europe, it's clearly not in the interest of either Putin or Russia (the most pessimistic estimates put his approval rating at over 60% among Russians).

Since it's obviously not to their advantage they won't agree to it. That means someone would have to force them to accept that new status quo. The US just dropped all support and China has made it pretty clear that they're not going to participate in any operation like that either.

So that leaves the EU. I'll circle back to my earlier question. Do you think the EU is ready to adopt and ratify a constitution if it came up again? Absent that, do you think the EU can put together a military coalition that's big enough and permanent enough to induce an immediate surrender by Russia? If not, do you think that the EU is willing and able to wage a protracted direct war against Russia?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can’t be supervised by it’s neighbours if the two biggest neighbours aren’t apart of it

If the US and China abandon Ukraine WW3 will happen so to pretend there’s a safe way out of it is unreasonable

The US will look to Canada

Russia will look to Germany

China will look to Taiwan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know if any of your predictions are true. They might be, but I don't have nearly enough evidence to be confident in any of them.

If they are, I don't see how the complete collapse of Russia is even remotely feasible. Those predictions add up to saying that none of the necessary pre-conditions have been or will be met. Together, they say that we have no way to coerce Russia into the desired state and we have no way to re-align their interest to get them to do so voluntarily.

China definitely won't swoop in to defend Ukraine against Russia. I think we can agree on that. It's pretty clear the US won't either. I think we can agree on that too.

That's why I'm wondering if you think the EU can get big enough to do so on it's own, and do so quickly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

i do not know if Europe can do it unfortunately

I am thankful that Europe knows enough about 2 front wars to not give up on us in Canada

Britain and France being nuclear powers and Germany having strong manufacturing may pose enough of a risk that they avoid a hot war and continue disinformation efforts

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Suppose there's a cockroach colony in a residential building. Separating it into few parts is not going to do much good. If you mean that by collapse - same elites retaining power - then it's just not good enough.

And if you mean removing them, rich natural resources have proven to be good for those who have them and bad for those who don't, so no.

Turning it into a real federation or even confederation - yes. Like Germany.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean the russian people doing to Putin and the oligarchs what the Libyans did to Gaddafi.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

No, death is erasure of information. He's head of state. He should be convicted in court and be put in jail.

Also showing that a head of state will be held accountable and then put behind bars is very useful, it's a treasure that shouldn't be destroyed by lynching.

Even in EU high-level politicans and bureaucrats already behave as if they can't be convicted for real crimes (scandals of the "he has a second apartment with nice door" are not that, I mean criminal decisions on post and assisting kickoff schemes, things legal only because there's nobody to judge officially otherwise, like surveillance legislations, and such). That's very dangerous, they should always remember they are not immune, neither in theory nor in practice.

This is the same with all of Russia's government. They shouldn't be just banned from working in such positions again, shouldn't be lynched or something, deprived of stolen properties. They should be thoroughly investigated and convicted accordingly.

Because otherwise it'll be just another change of leadership of a pirate colony, like in Syria. The king is dead - long live the king. No. These people should be shown to not be kings, just citizens who got too far, which shouldn't happen again.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

While the title is the usual nonsense, the interview is the usual nonsense delivery that the master of deals is going to save the day, when he couldn't deal his way out of a wet paper bag.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Placating? More like deep throating. The US is gluckglucking Russia and liking it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

Well... that's not too far off

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So Trump's going to give Ukraine all the weapons that they want?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Make Vladivostok into a Ukrainian beach resort

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

His handling of Ukraine is like his handling of Gaza, so he'll be giving Russia all the weapons they want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Hahahahahahaha. Try again

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

Liar

load more comments
view more: next ›