this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
670 points (98.8% liked)

News

25269 readers
3127 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

DOGE needs to get rid of those pesky safety regulations holding up the plane.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Oh man. Please. Please.

Not that it matters. Another bumbling moron is next in line. Then after that a religious zealot.

But for my own satisfaction....pleeeease.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago

SpaceX and BOEING engineers. You know what to do, right? GET TO WORK!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You want Vance? That's how you get Vance.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Vance might be smarter then Trump but there's not a chance MAGA coalesces around him if Trump dies. Without that, congressional R's won't bend the knee so readily.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump as a Putin sock puppet or Vance as a Putin sock puppet.

Still, it seems like a reasonable hope before we go out in the streets with pitchforks

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Vance doesn't have the personality to effectively order the ~~lynch mob~~ Republican voters around

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Musk orders Trump not the other way around

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

I like where this is going.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump is completely right on this issue. Despite the fact his plane is produced by a company plagued with consistent quality control issues I believe this should be rushed into service as quickly as possible. In fact, I agree that the anyone including temp workers should be allowed in to get this thing in the air today.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I'm sure they're good enough right now, send 'em on over.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago

"Never interrupt your opponent while he is in the middle of making a mistake."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Isn't that his MO anyway? I would have expected nothing less.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago

please_god_so_fucking_funny.png

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Can't wait to see his memoir "Half Assed, The Trump Legacy"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Can Musk use rebuilt engines from the plane that crashed in Toronto? Thanks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Yes please, can't wait to see the result of that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Nothing could go wrong with that, and i mean LITTERALLY nothing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh... I am loving this! I hope he puts it on a rush job to be completed and in the air with Trump, and his whole cabinet on board within 1 month.

EDIT

I hope we come up with a US Navy 1 submersible too, built by Elon! Trump can get in the idiot squisher too!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

SF1 get hit by de rock hoppa

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

By all means.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Sending thoughts and prayers … to Nidhogg.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"Trump dies in fatal Boeing crash, after rushing its production" is a headline id love to see

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

There would be a celebration in the streets. Doubly so if Musk was also onboard.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

"Trump dies in fatal Boeing crash, after rushing its production" is a headline id love to see

After rushing it's production and firing all the FAA safety inspectors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That can be improved by inserting "and Musk" after the first word.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As VP, Vance would be on Air Force Two as a precaution.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Maybe if we all concentrate hard enough we can will our reality back on track and make this happen. Somewhere around 2016 someone at CERN started a new experiment and ever since we've been in the wrong universe, through concerted efforts of enough of Earth's latent psychics maybe we can push this world back towards the correct timeline.

Or maybe make things worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I have no complaints…

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

The quality of the average Tesla should be the target.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Could we have all of them fly at the same time?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Man I hope Elon works expeditiously don’t wanna waste any time

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Man, it's wild to me to put the guy who wants your throne in charge of making your plane, but there you are. No matter what, I just hope Musk puts the same care and thoughtfulness he puts in all his manufacturing endeavors to the task.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago

Finally, a Trump order I agree with

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I mean, realistically, we would probably be just fine with Air Force One having no security systems at all. Like, the likelihood that someone is going to attack Air Force One probably isn't all that high, and you can also mitigate that by choosing where to fly the thing.

And as long as Trump understands any risk that he exposes himself to...I mean, it's not as if a future President is required to use the Trump-era Air Force One. It's really just him and people during his administration.

Most national leaders don't have anything like the kind of protection that the President does.

Now, granted, most also haven't had four assassination attempts against them be intercepted in past months, but I'm also not sure that shooting down Air Force One is the easiest way to assassinate the President, either.

EDIT: And I think that it's also worth considering that some of our norms for modern Presidential travel were developed during the Cold War, in an era of potential nuclear conflict where launch-on-warning was part of nuclear doctrine. In that scenario, the President needs to travel around with the nuclear football, and a decapitation strike might be an important early first move in a nuclear war.

But we haven't relied on launch-on-warning for a long time. The President is a lot more expendable in the context of dealing with an opposing nuclear first strike today; it's the SLBM arsenal used to counter that now.

Today, if a hostile state kills the President, it might produce disruption for a short period...but that disruption probably isn't going to buy all that much, strategically.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Today, if a hostile state kills the President, it might produce disruption for a short period…but that disruption probably isn’t going to buy all that much, strategically.

Can't possibly be any more disruption than what the current president is causing... So I'd call it a win if he was taken out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Most politicians are fine riding a bicycle to work, ride a train or a normal car, just fly a normal ass airline, things like that. But americans need them to ride in a tank because they love to kiss the feet of their celebrity overloards. I mean putin obviously can't or kim jong-un can't which says a lot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I always thought Air Force One needed security to prevent terrorists from taking the president hostage and forcing them to release more terrorists. But, our current president already lets a bunch of terrorists go like the Taliban and Jan Sixers.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›