this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
1088 points (97.9% liked)

politics

23952 readers
2694 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration's authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

All of the info in this article comes directly from the AXIOS Article which imo is a much better read and less biased against the Dems.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 months ago (2 children)


If only the fought as hard as they spam & grift

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It really pisses me off that the ONLY outreach I saw were requests for money. Hundreds of them (many may have been scams, not sure).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“The progressives” is not a party

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm telling you. The DNC is a sunk cost. You'll keep contributing to it thinking is valuable but when it's time to cash in they've already cashed out. At least the RNC spends it's political capital, mostly on shitty culture war shit, but they don't let it disintegrate into nothing.

If I could teach the DNC two words to use against the opposition it would be, "so what?" I mean, they use it on their constitutes all the time so it should be nothing new.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Constituent pressure? How frustrating!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They didn't seem all that frustrated in the Axios article which is the source of all of the information in this article, although I'm sure thousands of phone calls a day would get old fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 141 points 3 months ago (17 children)

Progressives need to start their own party. The establishment DNC is so entrenched with big donors and lobbyists that it is unable to serve the people. Their balancing act of appeasing both the right and the left is just serving to alienate everyone because the final policies get so diluted. They have become too stuck in the quagmire of their own doing. I don’t see the DNC being able to change any time soon and through their inaction, will only enable more devastation of the country.

The new Progressive party should align with the DNC as the opposition during this administration but simultaneously run more like minded candidates in the next elections with their own separate fundraising campaigns. That’s the only hope I have for meaningful change to happen.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

100% agreed, it’s time for a new party. Republican-lite is killing our nation.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The problem is you get the NDP/Liberal vs. Conservative effect when you do this. If you have 30% of the population vote for your Leftie, and 30% vote for the other Leftie, in a given congressional district, the Republican can win with 31%, despite 60% voting against the Republican. We need RCV before we can do this, and people need to understand that they MUST put the other party as choice 2 or we are back to ending up with a Republican.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You should check out the Axios article they cite before you write them all off. The supposed "gripefest" is just Dems talking about how they're recieving hundreds if not thousands of phone calls a day.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

There's a free app called 5 calls. It helps you to call your representative with a script. Progressives need to get on this. I'm aware it's a pain, but the script makes it a lot easier especially when you get an answering machine instead of a person.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Pictured: two of the most useless government employees in history, one of whose net worth grew tenfold after being appointed the successor to the queen of insider trading, and the other one of which is so deep in the pocket of fossil fuel interests that he needs a 12 foot snorkel to breathe.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Things really need to start now on establishing a party and running candidates from local on up to combat things in the next major elections. If the democrats refuse to properly do their jobs, then elect those who will.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (6 children)

We should call it the Workers with Guns Party

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And we still have swathes of Lemmy screaming that we need to call the Democrats and that they aren't useless as a party and that calls and emails are a valid and productive method of getting favorable action done.

And then the DNC have a private meeting to tell all the leaders of the leftist holding pens to get a better leash.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

If the calling and emailing is pissing them off why would you stop??

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we all collectively elect AOC to represent all elected democrats in the House? She'd get, like, 215 votes on every bill.

I know a person can hold only one position at a time; it was just a funny thought.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's amazing how inept they really are at being the opposition.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

They're not inept. They're in on it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money. But we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires.” - New DNC head

It's a good thing we can all agree on what the definition of good and bad is, and how its applied in our society right?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

" There are a lot of good billionaires out there..."

Let me stop you right there pal. There is no such thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, no, a good billionaire is a dead billionaire.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Say it with me, the Democratic Party is not a real political party.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly fuck these moderate assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Fuck me, weak-ass, lame-ass dems essentially fucking work for the fascists. Remove the slack-jawed shitweeds and replace with actual fighters, ffs

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Any of the ones who are upset about Progressives pushing them to act like an opposition party needs to be primaried and kicked out, if they can't be convinced. We need more primary challengers to actually change the party, like the republicans have and continue to do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They will get rid of primaries. They already did it last year

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Last year they didn't really have presidential primaries because of an Incumbent, something both parties do all the time. But there were still Congressional primaries. And local primaries. Saying they'll get rid of primaries when there was a reason to not have a presidential one, even if you disagree with that reason, is very much misunderstanding how primaries work.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

They are the ones who have the most ability to hold ORAGNE accountable. Keep the pressure on your Democrat representatives to DO THEIR FUCKING JOB! Signed, a concerned Canadian.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›