this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
617 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27731 readers
3700 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Wait until people finally get the epiphany that Star Trek is advocating for a world government. And how many here, including outside the Internet, would actually like that?

Precisely.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Don't forget that the whole Federation is a post captialist utopia which is a political statement in itself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

Don’t forget that the whole Federation is a post captialist utopia which is a political statement in itself.

Great point!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I liked Trek before Alex Kurzman stuck his filthy fingers in it and made entire franchise a steaming pile of dog shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Oh, OG Trek was woke AF, but it wasn't done as ham-handed and hackey as what is happening now. It used to feed open-mindedness into everyone's living room and was generally welcome to do so. What we have now is just slapping you in the face with its floppy cock of wokeness every chance it gets. There is now almost no actual plot other than that. Doctor Who is doing the exact same thing. Can nothing of my childhood just be left the fuck alone? I mean, yeah, represent the marginalized. Make female heroes, or transgender, or whatever and whoever you feel needs to be represented or empowered. Do all of that, but do you have to rewrite absolutely everything ever written to do it? Have an original thought. Honestly, at this point, it is just lazy writing masquerading as woke.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

I think this comment really nails what's irking me amount newer Trek. It used to be a show that was written in a way that regardless of your politics, anyone could watch, and it would make you think. It was a show that would sneakily slip in progressive ideas that could make you second guess your perspectives on the world.

Now there is no depth to it, it just slaps you in the face with politics.

This is probably gonna be a hot take, but I think Star Trek should be written in a way that is appealing for conservatives to watch, but regularly slips in metaphors which challenges their world view. Trek was at it's best when on it's surface it was a fun adventure show, and the politics was on a deeper level.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Explain more about how your childhood is ruined by political messaging in checks notes

Modern Doctor Who and Star Trek. The best written and acted shows of all time, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's done plainly in reference to real life now, as opposed to being integrated seamlessly into the show. a good example would be the episode where the doctor had to erase his mind and Martha (a black woman) had to try and protect him while posing as his servant because it was the 1800s when they were stranded. this was still in real history (aliens aside) but was integrated as part of the plotline and not randomly mentioned with no context. a good example of when they get this wrong is the special with the meep where Donna's daughter says something along the lines of "I'm nonbinary because the doctor-donna is binary" which doesn't make sense in the story because the doctor-donna is binary due to Donna literally merging with the doctor, not gender identity. these things can be integrated well and when you do they only enhance the story by making it feel more realistic, but you have to make them fit the story, not the other way round.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

“I’m nonbinary because the doctor-donna is binary”

My eyes rolled all the way to the back of my head when i saw this bit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

I get what they were trying to do but it was such a cop out instead of writing an actual explanation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That, or:

Your brain wasn't fully developed because you were a child.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

I rewatched the whole show just a couple months ago and I didn't watch TV much as a kid so I only saw a handful of episodes then. this is my current, up to date opinion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I think this is generally what I hear when it comes to "woke" media. I always chalk it up to media having no clue on how normal humans function in a society.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I never understood that complaint about Star Trek. The series has ALWAYS been woke since the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago

Kinda like people complaining Rage Against the Machine becoming political.
Always has been.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

True in a way, but it was more philosophical and not "in your face". It made you think about it, and the story was way waay better and deeper than today's pew-pew starwars approach to star trek. Every episode had a meaning and a lession.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

True in a way, but it was more philosophical and not “in your face”.

they did the first US interracial kiss during a time that would be controversial.

it was "in your face"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (8 children)

No mebtion of space communism? The federation is Marxist

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The Federation is not Marxist, communist, or socialist. These economic systems rely on a monetary framework where scarcity dictates value. In the Star Trek universe, scarcity has been eliminated on Earth. There is no energy crisis, no poverty, and no starvation. Transportation is instantaneous, and every individual's basic needs are met. With no financial struggle, humanity is no longer constrained by the pursuit of wealth. The Federation is not built on enforced equality but on a shared enlightenment. With abundant resources, every person enjoys a high standard of living.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What? No. Marxism notes that scarcity wouldn't be a thing with increasing industrialization. Indeed, it isn't; we have plenty of resources to put a roof over everyone's head and food in their belly. The base of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs can be completely covered, and the rest are not necessarily best fulfilled by mere material possessions. We could have the whole thing done in a year if society simply made the choice.

Now, I don't think the Federation is Marxist, because we actually know very little about how the economy works at all. There's contradictory information, it might depend on what time period or planet you're talking about, and the writers have generally been uninterested in exploring the economy beyond superficial mentions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

No. You're just wrong and in every aspect.

Please refer to my responses further down in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When you are in post scarcity and everyone has everything they need and everyone works together ina government for mutual benefit that's Marxist communism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

No it's not. (I have to be honest with you. You clearly have no clue what Marxism or communism is and yet you make a declarative statement that holds no water at all; why?)

While the Star Trek universe presents a post-scarcity society where money is largely obsolete and resources are distributed based on need, it diverges significantly from Karl Marx’s vision of communism. Marxist communism is fundamentally rooted in class struggle, revolution, and the eventual withering away of the state. The Star Trek Federation, however, remains highly structured, hierarchical, and governed by an institutionalized bureaucracy, notably Starfleet.

Moreover, technological advancements such as replicators eliminate material scarcity, a condition Marx never accounted for in his theories. Instead of a classless, stateless society emerging from historical struggle, Star Trek depicts a future where economic necessity is bypassed through technology, and individuals contribute based on personal fulfillment rather than class-driven labor dynamics.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Well

End-game socialist

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I mean Sisko kind of does when he describes how the Bell riots have to take place before we unite as a planet and join the Federation

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›