this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
921 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8491 readers
2719 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Nothin’ mo fine than a pound of mofine.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

'One Pound of Mofeen': Is the Old Pharmacist Story Real? Published Sept. 19, 2009

Rating: Legend

It's a made-up story...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The amount of confused euros ITT is hilarious. Yeah, the states is very backwards. Paper prescriptions, paper checks, paper social benefits cards. What most people don't realize, like in the meme, just because a pharmacy gets a prescription doesn't mean they don't call into the docs office to confirm the script. These are rituals from a bygone era that should have been long replaced by computers and near instantaneous communication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most prescriptions aren't on paper anymore though. I have heard that Japan (a very tech savvy country) is actually worse than us with checks and faxes and certain other low/old tech solutions. Not sure if that is true but either way I don't think the US is unique in this stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, occasionally, we'll request a paper one if we think we'll need to fill it at a random pharmacy, like when we're on vacation or it's for something that's likely out of stock.

Most US pharmacies seem to have problems transferring a script between locations, even within the same company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm, I recently had to deal with switching pharmacies (in the US) mid-prescription and I didn't really have any trouble. Went from CVS to a family owned shop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

It's not all the time... But, for example, last week, my wife had one sent to a CVS, apparently 10 minutes after they had closed. They didn't fill the script, but they did bill the insurance and were unable to transfer the script to a location that was open later.

About six months ago, I tried to transfer my script from our local target to another target nearby that actually had the item in stock. They said they'd transfer it. I drove over. They didn't have it. They tried to call the originating target CVS but they wouldn't pick up the phone.

Between the two, we decided to look into a mom and pop shop (of which there are precious few around us) the one close enough to make sense told us that our doctor was too far away. They were about a 20 minute drive back to there we used to live and we liked them. They were a #$%^ Johns Hopkins practice.

Walgreens f'd me over once because they couldn't scan my license. I had just renewed it for realID so my plastic license had expired. I had the paper DMV your license is valid and will come in the mail, use this paper in conjunction with your existing license until your new license arrives. I was trying to pick up a non-narcotic muscle relaxer because I fucked up my back.

I really really really hate pharmacies anymore. I should probably just order my shit online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Sometimes, if you're lucky and some generous company has deemed you worthy of a measure of healthcare, your pharmacist (or the person working the register) will make some face or comment when they see you're prescribed something they have opinions on (e.g. ADHD meds, anti-depressants, I'm sure many other things.)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Central EU, I get my prescriptions on paper. They also send them digitally to some system so I can simply walk into a pharmacy and pick up my stuff using me e-ID.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Also central EU. Some of my prescriptions are transferred socially via my health insurance card. Others are still on paper. Even if I get them from the same doctor during the same appointment, they might be mixed.

I haven't yet figured out the logic for which prescriptions are digital and which require paper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think this was changed in Washington. I’m not sure if you can still write physical paper opioid scripts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sometimes if I'm feeling lazy, I get the Doctors move the prescription to a pharmacy closer to my house. Rather than going into town.

Here are Americans with their paper flimsies. But you manage to have electronic voting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

There was a time when all you needed to call in a prescription in Denmark, was the doctors authorization number... Which was publicly available. Sure if you called in a prescription at a pharmacy across the country or sounded suspicious, the pharmacy would make a call back, but other than that all you had to do was pick a doctor in an area with lots of other doctors and near a large pharmacy, and you'd get whatever you liked.

It must have been so for +10 years before a journalist and a doctor blew it up, by having the journalist phone in prescriptions for morphine, barbiturates, and other recreationally applicable substances. I don't know if a doctor can still phone in prescriptions, but the immediate stop gap was to only accept prescriptions accompanied by the doctor's personal, and crucially private, SSN.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plastic surgeon, RX pad, script, Mofine... I guess Mofine is the new guy they sent to collect at the pharmacy. Italian surname by the looks of it. RX relates to a racecar of sorts, not surprising since surgeons are said to be wealthy. Not sure about the script part though : do pharmacists typically double as programmers ? or is it like, a movie script ? in which case it might just all be cinema. There's more to this message that we understand right now. Keep digging, Mofine. We'll get 'em

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RX as opposed to TX. Receiver and transmitter in radio communications

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Thanks !! the fog of war is slowly clearing

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's still hard for me to believe that this is how pharmaceuticals are secured.

Pharmacist: "Should we dispense this potentially dangerous drug, it's a large quantity?"

Other Pharmacist: "Of course, look at the paper, it has the correct letterhead!"

It's basically like doctors sit around with a stack full of signed blank checks in their offices, and every once in a while someone steals one and makes a huge withdrawal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It used to be fairly normal, the pharmasists knew the various doctors in the area, and they also know what is a reasonable prescription. If there was any doubt, they'd contact the doctor before dispensing the drugs. I had the 'interesting' experience of having to go to multiple pharmacies, filling part of the total prescription at each, when I tried to fill a largeish morphine prescription for a family member. There'd been some sort of issue at the main supplier, and none of the induvidual pharmacies had much stock left. It was resolved a few dats later fortunately.

Things are a lot more digital now-a-days, which hopefully makes fraud less of an issue, and definitely makes getting medicines easier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They also used specific medical names for things and scribbled them horribly so they'd be hard to read if you didn't know what you were looking for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It used to be fairly normal, the pharmasists knew the various doctors in the area, and they also know what is a reasonable prescription.

That just seems like a system that is broken by design. If the pharmacists know what a reasonable prescription is, then why bother with the prescription pad at all? Just have the patient ask the pharmacist for whatever it was the doctor recommended.

I suppose what probably happened was that initially the prescription pad was just any random scrap of paper and the doctor wrote down the prescription so that the patient didn't have to remember the exact details. But, then drugs started getting more powerful, and people started abusing them, so what used to simply be a note to help the patient remember became a secured way to authorize the pharmacy to dispense something.

If the system had needed security right from the start, it probably would have been a system where the doctor sent a prescription directly to the pharmacy via a courier, a phone call, a telegram, or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

You're probably not far off in how the presciption pad evolved, but pharmasists, at least here, have extensive training, and some can actually write prescriptions for certain medications. The system has evolved over a very long time, and security is definitely one of those things that's had to evolve with those changes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you start thinking about it, most security and well being norms are just protected by people that believe in the social norm behaving correctly.

Why can't you go behind the counter, enter the kitchen and pee in a McDonald's hamburguer? Not due to some law of nature or magic force field, but because the workers (or security guard) won't let you. Why won't they let you? Due to a systematic belief system on the entity "McDonald's", their job, what's right and wrong, etc.

But they could simply let you. A banker could let you take a few $100 bills. The consequences are almost entirely based on social rules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but those are cases where someone with the job and authority to stop someone from breaking the rules and is choosing not to. Prescription pads are just these wildly insecure things where once the pad is stolen (which is relatively easy to do), it seems like the system is designed to just blindly trust them. I know that has changed a bit in the modern world, but even that it was once like that seems weird.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, all it takes for you to drive a metric ton of metal at 120 KM/h in public is somebody signing a document claiming you know how to drive.

The only thing preventing you from creating poisonous gases from two cheap supermarket cleaning products is your own desire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but if I want to get a driver's license, I can't just walk up to the DMV with a document on the right letterhead and get a license. There's actually a whole process involving a test.

The fact that a pharmacy requires a prescription on a certain kind of pad from a doctor means that that's supposed to be a security measure. It's supposed to stop someone from getting a prescription that they just scribbled on a random piece of paper they found. But, in terms of security, it's just about the weakest form of security I can imagine.

It's basically the equivalent of this:

Fence gate blocking a path, but no fence on the grass next to it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't just walk up to the DMV with a document on the right letterhead and get a license. There's actually a whole process involving a test.

In theory. In practice, an employee could skip all steps and pretend you concluded the test.

Similarly, a pharmacy expects that you went through a long process with a doctor diagnosing and ordering the medicine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

In theory. In practice, an employee could skip all steps and pretend you concluded the test.

Yes, they could break the rules.

Similarly, a pharmacy expects that you went through a long process with a doctor diagnosing and ordering the medicine.

While following the rules, they could just accept whatever you wrote onto the paper.

See the difference? In one case the security model is reasonable so that it takes an employee cheating / breaking the rules for a bad result. In the other case the security model sucks so an undesirable outcome is possible even if all the security checks are followed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Why can’t you go behind the counter, enter the kitchen and pee in a McDonald’s hamburguer?

You can, at least once. But if you wanted to do it regularly, it'd be easiest to just apply for a job there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

There are quite a few special requirements that need to be met for narcotics to be dispensed. Can they be ignored? Yup! Also, there should be some numbers run first and in many states an online check is required as well.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm guessing, the RX Pad can be used to print a prescription on a piece of paper?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Like some kind of advanced iPad?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Probably a facsimile of the prescription from the fax machine

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

£1 of morphine won’t last very long in this economy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Just hit up Teresa May's husband, he's good for illicit drugs.

load more comments
view more: next ›