this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
169 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60462 readers
3886 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 32 minutes ago

Google announced that something like 25% of their code is AI generated now, and it'd be hilarious how much these companies have enshittified themselves into a cycle of constant self-owns except that we keep suffering for it too.

Like every google app and service is bad now. Search sucks. YouTube apps are bloated, have been crashing, and the algorithm is serving up just random stuff now. G Maps won't stay open on my phone, and randomly minimizes itself. Gmail is out of space, full of newsletters, and also degrading in search.

Facebook is the same deal. I've been on it more recently because I need to track events and it's all anyone in this city uses. Searching for the name of an event, which you've stated you're going to, by it's exact name, will find nothing, or an older version of the event from 4 years ago. The feed is 90% ads and sponsored posts, mostly videos. And the videos aren't ads, they're just random tiktok-wannabes about paint mixing or machining stuff. It's utterly bizarre to be inundated with clickbait that desperately wants your attention for no reason.

I consider myself a pretty good engineer and it's amazing how little these companies can accomplish with literally tens of thousands of developers. Its another of the great paradoxes of our times: individually, software devs must be among the least productive workers of all time, and yet as a group the profession (the computer itself really) has realized such astronomical productivity gains that we're probably already past the point where anyone really needs to work full-time ever again.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess it will impact heavily those who took days off in a protest to the new community guidelines...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

But that's just a coincidence, I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 17 hours ago

Time to print out your commit history and show Zuck how many lines of code you wrote last month!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Show me the lowest 5% of performers at Meta and I'll show you people doing God's work.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

i show you mark zuckerberg

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Now, now, I know its human costume is not perfect yet, but just don't look into its eyes and you should be OK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Probably the metaverse crew. I doubt that's God's work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

Imagine working in the department the company is now named after and realizing your whole product line is irrelevant and the AI-people get all the money now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago

Wasting meta's resources on a deserted wasteland absolutely nobody wants or cares about? I think I don't mind that actually.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

Meta has workers? Thought everything is attached to that shitty hub system they've been leaning on for years now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean... It makes sense if they like money.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago

Gotta make them fear for their jobs. Keep the workers in line.

Unionize!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Unless they're axing the top 5% of the org chart, they're not cutting the lowest performers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Ohh look big tech is doing veneric corpo shit now...

Tech workers deff dont need a Union 🤡

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Bye Bye, Meta, I wish I could say it was fun.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

This is the typical Jack Welch stack-ranking nonsense. The theory is that there will always be a bell curve or similar distribution that requires a certain percent (Welch said 10%, but it's all over the map) be cut while new hires are constantly brought on.

It kills morale and forces employees into short-term impact patterns to avoid the constant churn of cuts. It also means that performative work rather than actual substantive work is encouraged, since the appearance of productivity in whatever metric is stack-ranked is all that matters.

Finally, it encourages people to do the minimum, because the alternative is to compete for bonuses that are only going to the people who meet the highest appearance of productivity metrics, which doesn't correlate strongly with actual productivity, just as actual productivity (in terms of "producing" output) is also not strongly correlated with value (such as by knowing enough to efficiently complete tasks such that you are not appearing to "produce," due to being extremely efficient).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Finally, it encourages people to do the minimum, because the alternative is to compete for bonuses that are only going to the people who meet the highest appearance of productivity metrics

Oh yeah they called them "STAR awards" or something to try and make it look like some great achievement.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Just did a review and we successfully removed KPIs from our project by pointing out that we could hit the targets and cost the company money or we could operate as required instead of trying to please metrics that, while relevant at a surface level, are impacted by external forces.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Will you talk to my bosses? They're addicted to arbitrary KPIs and rank & spank.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

"I absolutely can operate to lines of code per month but until we agree detailed targets with our client we will be building roads to nowhere. Instead we could be using this time to focus on process improvement, documentation and acclimarising new staff"

I dont build roads or write code but this the gist.

Aalso our project is long term, somewhat changeable and dependent on industrial agreements outside our team.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 21 hours ago

This kind of system is how you get the consistency and excellence that microsoft are known for.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Great for creating a lot of churn and quick-fix make-work. Rather than deploying a single comprehensive solution to a persistent problem, just take credit for fixing the symptoms over and over and over again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

just take credit for fixing the symptoms over and over and over again.

If the goal of the individual is a measurable delta of positive change, then it would be beneficial to the individual to cultivate problems now to solve and get recognized for future accomplishments? It would be much easier to solve a problem that you know intimately, because you were the original cause.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 21 hours ago

i worked at fb a long time ago, it was already exactly like how you describe. everyone was optimizing for their performance review—juicing metrics and prioritizing for the short term. accountability only existed in a 6-month cycle.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Then the ones just above the lowest 5% become the newest lowest 5%.

Is he gonna cut them next ?

First they came for the lowest 5%,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a lowest 5%.
Then they came for the lowest 5%,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a lowest 5%.
Then they came for the lowest 5%,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a lowest 5%.
Then they came for me,
and by that time there was no one
left to cut below me.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

What you can end up with is a lot of new hires queued up for the firing line. The "bottom 5%" is, initially, the people in the office who are currently in a slump. But then you bring on a load of fresh new hires who have little experience and a lot of pressure. They burn out fast and become the next "bottom 5%".

Meanwhile, the more politically and technically savvy learn to survive by creating make-work tasks that look good on performance metrics but do little for the firm as a whole. Their superiors approve, because a team that is constantly appearing busy is more important than a team that's producing anything of value. So you end up with these little entrenched departmental fiefs, dedicated to making themselves irreplaceable at the expense of the company as a whole.

There's a ton written on the Sears collapse in the early 00s, where this exact dynamic played out. Managers turned against one another, because stack ranking mattered more than inter-department cohesion or bottom line figures. The company went from a network of high end retailers to a shitty outlet stores over the course of a decade.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What even counts as "performing" there?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

Number of likes.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

who is going to be the next CEO?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

I heard vice president Donald Trump might be interested if president Musk will let him

[–] [email protected] 40 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Somehow i doubt this'll affect anyone with "manager", "head", "chief" or "officer" in the name...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

It might if they show support for their gay or trans colleagues

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

I'm not sure if you're up to date on how layoffs have been done lately in tech, but management has been primary targets in layoffs. Full layers of management have been removed, and middle managers have often been expected to take on twice as many reports for no increase in compensation.

No comments on the C-level part which is largely correct

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Funny enough, it’s all content moderators and fact checkers.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Its most aggressive at the higher tiers, because promotions are a tool of employee retention and "flattening" the management stack is a good way of pushing out the experienced, expensive older employees. You'll also see a lot more outsourcing of department rolls, as C-levels opt for lowest-bidder contractors you can hire/fire inside a business cycle than big teams of veteran staffers who sit on the payroll thick or thin. That means fewer mid-level managers, as the actual process of team management is sent overseas or subcontracted out to temporary management firms.

McDonald Douglas and Yahoo both executed on this strategy back in the 90s to great effect. Stock valuations boomed, because they were able to create the illusion of cost cutting without impacting quarterly revenue. All it cost them was mountains of technical debt. And then nothing bad happened to either company.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 22 hours ago

They may inadvertently focus on people who spoke against the new "pro free speech" of Facebook...

[–] [email protected] 68 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Oh no, poor Zuckerberg, what is going to do after he's fired? He has no marketable skills at all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he die just today trying to suck on his own penis? Hard to keep up with the news these days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

I heard that he did get to suck his own cock but when he came he choked on the other Guy's golden finger. I don't know if this is an appropriate topic though. He had a big fat cock...he paid the guy a few thousand a day. Why would he suck his own is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago

Also with the abandonment of DEI initiatives, there are no longer any protections for Lizard-Amercians.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago

Nothing a little reprogramming can't fix.