this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
746 points (98.6% liked)

Games

38662 readers
1361 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No way, it’s only 10 hours? Eternal was longer than that, and so was 2016!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you also rate books by the number of pages?

This attitude here is what has fucked up gaming more than any greedy publisher ever did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If a book costs 80€ for a ten hour read, it's a complete ripoff that nobody would buy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But what if the book were titled, "Here's how I became a millionaire" or "steps to become a millionaire" or stuff like that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those are still a ripoff at 1€

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Well, it would really just be a 2 - 10 second read, depending upon how fast you read, so...

On the other hand, do you consider time taken imagining the story, as part of the reading time, because I know a book that would have a months long reading time in that case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless it was a new Harry Potter apparently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

You still had the choice between a cheaper pocket book and the bound version.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I finished DOOM (2016) in 8.8 hours. Granted I didn't stop for collectables and was on normal mode. I tried Eternal but got bored after 2 hours so that's what I'm basing it off.

My steam friends currently have about 17 hours (they bought it early) but they like collecting stuff and getting 100% achievements. I'm not sure how long the story is without 100%ing it but it shouldn't be too different from the other games.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why do you even play games if you rush them? It's like the guy a few years ago asking on Reddit if he should go past no return in Cyberpunk 2077 at level 18. The fuck, mate? You missed the whole game!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I did all the fixer missions in Cyberpunk and honestly wish I hadn't bothered.

It destroyed the pacing completely, and did nothing but waste my time. Like sure, they're not automatically generated or anything, but they don't add anything to the game experience.

The same goes for pretty much every open world game that isn't designed around actual exploration. If your map is a sea of icons, your open world game isn't that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Who said I was rushing? Gathering the collectables is a chore so I just progressed through the story and finished it.

Edit: Also my friend 100% the new Doom game on the highest difficulty in 21 hours. Doom games are short in general.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

A bunch of people are like that, too.

It's like buying some expensive bottle of wine, thwn chugging half. And throwing the rest away.