this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
343 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former U.N. ambassador has been focusing in on Trump, his legal trouble and the potential general election consequences.

Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley on Wednesday called on Republican National Committee members to hold an on-the-record vote on a draft resolution that would curb the national party’s ability to direct its funds toward legal fees, including former President Donald Trump's.

“All Americans, and Republicans especially, deserve a vote on the record on that resolution,” Haley said while campaigning here. “We deserve to know how the RNC is going to spend their money and if it’s going to go towards legal fees.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 107 points 6 months ago (5 children)

As a non-American it's kind of insane to me that a political party can even potentially pay the legal fees of a party member (particularly when the fees are the result of completely personal crimes).

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

(Not so) fun fact: the DNC and RNC aren't any sort of governmental organizations, and are in fact private companies. As such, the limits placed on them by law are pretty minimal in terms of political action they can take, and quite unlikely to change since they both have a stranglehold on who gets nominated into positions that could affect such change.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Which is why if he is found guilty of the coup attempt he would be declared an enemy of the state, and any aid or comfort would be considered treason under penalty of law. The courts have ruled that companies are allotted rights as a person, aka they are guilty of treason if Trump is declared an enemy of the state. Best defense, "we didn't know we were commiting treason as he wasn't found guilty, just several of our members knew it"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's a legal gray area, it could be a campaign finance violation but he could argue some of the cases are campaign related.

The justice system has always been extremely light on Trump, so anything in a legal "gray area" might as well be assumed to be fully in the clear for him.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

It's because the Supreme Court made a ruling that affirmed that since corporations are people, and money is speech, it is unconstitutional to restrict how much money a corporation spends on political issues.

And what is a political issue? Trump says all of his legal issues are politically motivated. He's lying, but does that (false) statement alone justify unlimited spending on this political issue?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Republicans should be outraged about it too, but they apparently don't realize they are being fleeced (again).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

They know. They like that it upsets liberals more than them. They, like most people are used to our government constantly failing the people. They just want other people to be failed harder than them. No more, no less. They mistakenly feel that's what everyone else wants as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Something something party of fiscal responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Republicans will suffer in a Trump dictatorship and they're ready to kill for that opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

wdym they're fully aware they're paying Trump's legal fees. They either love that or are mildly annoyed and won't do anything.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

As an American, I feel the same way.