this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
980 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19965 readers
2986 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we're having this crisis now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic

It’s the domestic part we have to concern ourselves with, and thankfully the Joint Chiefs seem to still think he’s an idiotic shitbag

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s the domestic part we have to concern ourselves with, and thankfully the Joint Chiefs seem to still think he’s an idiotic shitbag

As a veteran, I remain 100% convinced that the Pentagon has and has always had a plan for "a dictator becomes president." However, also as a veteran I'm sure there is a very specific checklist of things that must be true for that plan to be activated.

As a low ranking veteran I don't have any better guess than anyone else what things are on that checklist, but I feel sure it exists, and that if we aren't seeing them mobilize it's only because it's an extreme event and the conditions required to execute on that plan are many.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I’m sure they always have since the 25th amendment was written, maybe POTUS is incapacitated because he’s an aspiring dictator, who knows. I’d bet there’s mountains of folders in the Pentagon with various contingencies. Mostly inaction I’d expect, if a boomer Captain is ordered to fire on Kyiv he just ignores the message etc,

With every passing year there seem to be more and more anti-choice Christo fascists appointed to benches and local govt though so all I can do is hope my compatriots remember the oath we all swore and stand up to the wannabe dictator.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They might think he's a shitbag, but I bet they're not unhappy with him. Unless he threatens to cut their spending?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

i think there are still people in power that actually believe in the merits this country was founded on and would stand up to pieces of shit like trump. it's the only thing i left i have to believe in.

i certainly have no reason to believe that the limp-wristed leftists of social media would ever stand up to anyone about anything.