Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Listen, I don't know a ton about USAID, so I won't defend it-though I've personally not seen any reporting that supports what you're saying. Keep in mind, this isn't Trump's first rodeo. USAID was operating under him during his previous term.
What I'd really like for you to explain is how NOAA is presumably burning tons of cash in a way that doesn't benefit taxpayers.
If they were really interested in trimming the fat, they'd go after the DoD, which is where they'd likely "recover" the largest amount. But I'd guess they don't touch that budget at all. And in the unlikely event they did, you can bet anything to do with SpaceX won't be touched.
https://kutv.com/news/nation-world/list-insane-priorities-of-usaid-spending-during-biden-administration-foreign-assistance-president-donald-trump-karoline-leavitt-condoms-in-gaza-elon-musk-department-of-government-efficiency
KUTV is considered a "center" news source so I hope that will be acceptable for you.
I don't know anything about NOAA so I can't speak to that particular topic at this time, but I am curious so I will be taking a look when I get a chance.
You are absolutely fucking right that the DOD is a giant money burning machine. 5k for 1 screw or whatever that meme was (assuming it's true) is just downright irresponsible spending. Something tells me they won't be touching DOD, but we can remain hopeful that it will be receiving similar scrutiny.
And yes it seems unlikely that Musk and gang are gonna throw the books of space x open for the public but you never know. We are in a wild fuckin timeline right now.
Your source, KUTV, is a Sinclair owned station. They have an insane pro-fascism bias. You might want to find a balanced informed source rather than a propaganda source.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/kutv
They specifically don't use ownership as a measurement for bias. They rate news outlets on the content only.
I doubt that will do much to change your opinion on the matter but I figured I would at least let you know where I got the information that KUTV was a center news source.
I try to keep myself informed from news sources across the spectrum, but that is often easier said than done.