Ask Lemmy

27801 readers

1334 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

6) No US Politics.

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you think a religious Marxist weird? (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

First, I don't know where I have to put this kind of question on Lemmy so I'm asking it here. Marx viewed religion as a negative force, often referring to it as the 'opiate of the masses.' If someone is religious and also identifies as a Marxist, do you think that's contradictory, or is it just a matter of mislabeling themselves? Would it be more accurate for them to call themselves a socialist instead of a Marxist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I wouldn’t say I couldn’t be called religious, I honor God the best I can

Of course your are religious if you "honor god the best you can".

Perhaps we have different definitions of the word "religious," but this statement is just nonsensical to atheists. It would be like saying, "I don't believe in Santa Claus, but I honor Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer the best I can." It's just nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It's the term "religious"/"religion" that messes up the exchange. It's not an "unironic" term. Strictly speaking, it implies there is a willingness to deviate when an individual applies it. It would be comparable to talking about calling oneself "weird"; in most places, doing that would make people think "so are you that way on purpose". I was trying to swerve it because I do genuinely adhere to God and it gives vibes like I'm not who I am based on experience.