this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
582 points (95.0% liked)
Technology
59405 readers
2702 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"X is cancer", "X spreads like cancer", "X is cancerous" are so incredibly common phrases. Are they generally considered inappropriate?
"Spreads like cancer" not so much to me. "Is cancerous" I would say to avoid saying, unless it legitimately IS a risk for cancer.
I was told that being in a brick building, is not a threat for cancer. However, living in a brick home after say 40 years, actually CAN be a risk for cancer. Which not a lot of people would know. So I think keeping "is cancerous" to an actual legitimate basis is a good idea to spread actual good information. Because if I said "brick houses are cancerous", that sounds like an exaggeration, but in the long run it's true.
"Is cancer" really just depends on how casually its being used. Something that causes you a mild inconvienence? Yeah, I'd find that offensive. But using it towards something that may not be literal cancer, but still poses a physical harm, I find less offensive. Like saying "Nestle is a cancer on this planet". I wouldn't find that offensive, because Nestle uses literal slavery, while draining the planet of natural resources, and giving the middle finger to everyone else. Yeah, THAT can be called a cancer. But youtube? Put on an adblock, move on with your day.