this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
637 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24555 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than half of Americans believe that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has gone “too far” in its pursuit of arresting migrants, according to a new poll.

While 54 percent said ICE has used its power too aggressively, the sentiment was even greater among Democrats at 83%, according to a poll by PBS News, NP and Marist.

Nearly half of Republicans, by contrast, said ICE’s actions are appropriate and an additional 31% said the agency had not gone far enough in enforcing Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda.

The vast majority of Americans (80%) support the U.S. government's deportation of migrants without permanent legal status who have been convicted of a violent crime.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats are still attacking Mamdani

Some elected politicians with a D by their name are.

And frankly I don't think they'll be in office much longer.

Like, as an American who has been paying attention since the DNC defended Bill lying about getting a BJ from an intern:

This is the most optimistic I've been about the Dem party except for the brief window between Obama winning the 08 election, and then him saying he wouldn't name a DNC chair.

I can go on a big rant with details on why we should be optimistic about the party and the country if you want, but if you're ok with recycling I can link you an old comment.

It's fucking weird to spend this much time defending the DNC, but people need to understand the chair is the DNC. And we've got a really fucking good chair since February, and he is already doing shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

if you're ok with recycling I can link you an old comment.

Yes please

we've got a really fucking good chair

I've seen nothing but criticism of Ken Martin

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/19/dnc-chair-ken-martin-infighting-00413409

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"Longtime party insiders" whining about him is how you can tell he's good.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

https://lemmy.world/post/32308685/17988594

https://lemmy.world/post/32269627/17972357

https://lemmy.world/post/32114298/17920447

https://lemmy.world/post/30822622?scrollToComments=true

And from your link:

Interviews with a dozen DNC members revealed deep frustration with Martin and concern about his ability to unify and lead a party trying to recover from massive electoral losses in 2024.

There's a lot more than a dozen DNC members who hate him...

He literally just got two super delegates from the Rules and Bylaws committee to resign...

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/dnc-union-leaders-leave/

They were literally the ones fucking with presidential primaries, and now they're no longer part of the DNC in any capacity...

Like, if you agree that past iterations of the DNC were giant pieces of shit, how are you surprised that there's still some DNC members from that period who are pissed they're no longer in control?

Logically this is a good thing that some are mad at Ken and completely leaving the party.

This is what we wanted.

The issue is billionaire owned media didn't want this, so they're presenting it backwards.

And people are falling for it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think there will be a midterm election given all that's happening and the speed this administration is userping power?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep.

And if elections are cancelled, I think enough people move on to the next of the four boxes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good luck! I personally have a bad feeling but I'm not American, it looks very bad from here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

1/3 can, 1/3 will fight them and the remaining will watch from the sidelines