mars296

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

They have a trigger safety. It looks almost like a tiny trigger within the trigger. Essentially means that it will only fire if you pull the trigger. It makes sense for trained personnel since they won't be pulling the trigger unless they intend to fire and mistakenly leaving a safety on when you need to shoot can get you killed. Still seems very sketchy to me even though I understand that logically, it's just as safe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

More like ig-miss amiright

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's essentially just a jig to use regular utility blades to quickly cut strips of equal width.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

He had a knife, had stated he was going to kill them, and was allegedly charging at them. Apparently they also used tasers on him but they were ineffective. But otherwise yes, safety is one factor.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I had never heard about him blowing up Kid Cudi's car

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Tess of Tuberville: a modern take on a classic.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nah cut here to open is worse. It's always an inch above where you actually need to cut.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I was talking about this one particular journalist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I've always heard the figure being 12 million total. I actually saw an older piece of material recently that mentioned the total as being 11 million.i agree that saying Jews were a majority is incorrect and misleading but I don't think it's intentional misinformation. It was the largest individual group.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sometimes I read highly pivoted comments with info that is plain wrong and think I'm taking crazy pills.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This whole thread is very pedantic but in chemistry when someone refers to chlorine, they are usually referring to Cl2. I think in IUPAC naming chloride is reserved for for ions. Like dichloromethane (IUPAC) and methylene chloride (also common name).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›