You mean all those profits aren't going to trickle down?
ajoebyanyothername
Then they should be lumped in the with ones that did vote for him. Is someone is apathetic enough to not even engage in the process, they don't get to avoid the insults, as far as I'm concerned.
It reads like a question simultaneously sent through google translate and a thesaurus. I've tried several times, but I just cannot work out what I'm being asked.
Methinks the JD doth protest too much.
Or trusted.
He'll answer in two weeks.
I'm guessing that's in reference to your reply to someone else about messages going out asking for donations after the supreme court decision? That may be in poor taste, I'll grant you, bug doesn't change the fact that it still wasn't the democrats that made the decision in the first place.
If Person A punches Person B, and Person C could have stopped it, I would still blame Person A for throwing the punch.
I mean, I am utterly befuddled at how you could reach that conclusion.
It's a bold take to blame the side that failed to prevent something, rather than the side that actually did the thing.
But not from X. Checkmate haters.
And then give them to the count of 10 to get their ugly, yellow, no-good keister off my property, before I pump their guts full of lead.