TheSpookiestUser

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Because Reddit is in the unique position where a small amount of users can affect a vast swathe of their platform - moderators.

Most mods don't care, by volume. The ones that do are often also the ones that are more active, more engaged, and more entwined with communities outside Reddit.

During the protest last year, polls come back favorably pretty much everywhere to shut down - but after the shutdown actually happened, a tidal wave of lurkers who never vote and never comment came out of the woodwork to complain and call it all stupid. Public opinion of all users is likely against practically any protest that could happen.

I don't like it, but that's how it is. The best realistic outcome is that a large contingent of content creators and more informed users leave the site - but how many of those are left that haven't already vamoosed and are still willing to leave under some unknown worse circumstance?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Not in any way the average user cares much about.

The causal social media user cares for two things:

  1. A constant uninterrupted stream of content

  2. Dopamine in the form of upvotes/likes/what have you

If these two things aren't interupted, 90% of users won't care.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Let's be honest with ourselves - no, it won't be wildly unpopular. This change affects very few people and the people still using Reddit at this point likely won't care much, and I have doubt any future change would cause much outrage either.

Because think about this - who is actively complaining and gnashing their teeth about the continued downward spiral and still scrolling, posting, moderating there at this point? I'd love to believe more people would jump ship - but if it ever happened it would take a far larger-scope fuckup than anything we've seen so far.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

There is a point where more users may bring more downsides than upsides - but we haven't reached that point yet. There are still many many niche communities that have no equivalent here and starting them would never take off with the current number of people.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 months ago

this hit me like a mental flashbang. your wisdom is beyond all of us

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

People that don't check what community a post came from on their home feed and just upvote it if they like it.

Full disclosure: that was me just now until I opened the comments, realized, then took it back. It's very easy to miss sometimes

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Isn't the way it works now also a debate winner? The blocked user can reply to you and you won't even know, so you can't refute whatever they've said (and if you've blocked them there's decent odds it isn't good).

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

This is what happens when you step on the wrong bug a couple million years ago

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

In my DnD group, my goblin wizard still holds the honor of being the only party member the DM has used Power Word Kill on.

I'm honored.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (5 children)

we have to go back to our roots

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I often see this accomplished with dashed interjections - dashes! can you believe that? - as a way to break up a sentence while still continuing with a single train of thought. But I always support the invention of new punctuation, how long has it been since we got any? We're well overdue.

 
 

It's like it wanted me to find it, sticking out of the wall...

0
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

C'mon, surely you'll be able to figure this one out, given your supernatural abilities.

 

Going back to broad strokes genres, this week's topic concerns the FPS (First Person Shooter), a staple of the overall gaming scene.

A First Person Shooter is the type of game where you play from a first person perspective (big shocker) and focuses around shooting (bigger shocker there), whether that's other players or NPC enemies. It's nice for a genre to be so plainly self-descriptive! FPS games also involve the navigation of a 3D environment, and often times incorporate standard concepts that are ubiquitous at this point like ammo management and loadouts of different weapons. This genre was heavily shaped by Doom (the original, released in early 90s), to the point where before the name FPS fully took hold, one term often used was "Doom clones". Nowadays there are many subgenres and styles paired with the FPS - class-based shooters, "boomer shooters", milsim and/or tactical shooters, twitch shooters, and others.

Here are some questions and subtopics that I encourage people to discuss:

  • What are some of your favorite subgenres or styles of FPS, and your favorite games from them?
  • Do you enjoy secondary concepts often associated with FPS games like ammo management and loadout adjustment?
  • What genres do you like to see crossed over with an FPS?
  • Do you prefer multiplayer or singleplayer FPS games? For multiplayer, Co-op or PvP?
  • What are some of your favorite weapons from FPS titles? What's been memorable?

Also feel free to bring up anything you like related to the topic! If you have suggestions for future discussion topics, leave them in the suggestion thread.

Additional Resources

view more: next ›