Kirsche_z

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

Two jobs eh? How convenient for two tools..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What kind of freak owns all those tools... I'm afraid to ask what you would even do with those. Why would you want to be able hide a saw in your pocket???

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

No, i use my rotary cutter for my bagels.. I don't think you're round enough for a saw just yet... are you hungry?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

What, you want to be next? I don't think you can fit in a jar..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Who wants to rule it fuzzy style.

 

"Come get it while it's fuzzy."

What.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Look, there's only 2 WAYS to fund my alcoholism.. and i want to choose the one where i outlive my competitors. 😼🍷

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

Yeah, why else would i eat them, a true apex starts at the top of the food chain.. those bugs are next up in the jar...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Okay that's completely different because now i'm the victim, not fair. 🐱

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

i was thinking centaur, but that's only because i accidentally had horse once.

Not that it would make it better.. i get shy when eating people 😼

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

yes!! finally someone who understands preserving organs for their resell value!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (10 children)

You can cry all you want, but now i have spider jerkey..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Puddle has been wet for a while, infact, it's practically almost an inland ocean, why do you think we're funding drone wars? Ai computing? Quantum computers? tactical robotics? Surveilence companies like Pegasus, Blackrock, Palantir, Even our our domestic surveilence is getting a larger check than defense. It's a very deliberate "funding" of institutions that ultimately give the police an upperhand, not saying that the police are directly funding these institutions, but rather the state, although not much when it comes to anything outside the defense budget.

There's a reason why privacy advocates are for alternative tech, and that's because since 9/11, corporations have become "lobbied" for lack of a better word, to include backdoors and implement certain tech to aid a surveilence state, such as the removal of headphone jacks, the endorsement of useless and extremely vulnerable tech that's more energy wasting, blutooth products (yeah i have a problem with it, everyone should), fingerprint sensors, front and back facing cameras, artificial intelligence (yes even the older models.), and even going as far as to add metadata to photos that give your exact geolocation data.

Don't even get me started on the invasive software that comes with the tech, like auto generated albums, or auto editing photos, the such, it pisses me off that we let these things happen. Alternative tech makes it much harder to intercept such vulnerable information, ofcourse, it won't completely stop it, but it mitigates how much they can swipe under your nose.

Not only that, but check upon the "Blue Shield Act," it explains the motive for corruption within the american institutions of police, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. It's the common trope for the kinds of psychopaths that would be okay with doing the job in the first place. If there's one thing that makes their job easier, it's definitely going to be you in cuffs staying silent, so why try to steer away from cutting corners? We're the law, what we say is final. Until it isn't ofcourse..

But that's the problem, as you state in your comment above, this abuse of power is shrugged off, almost as if a normal behaviour, expected. It's digusting to see it even when i grew up around the same mentality. But hey, at least their method clearly seems to be working, we're practically silent seeing as they still have the confidence to fuck with our lives.

Just remember, it's final until it isn't.

Blue Shield/Blue Wall/Blue Code https.//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_wall_of_silence

 

No i don't.

 

At the center of the Rule.

 

What's the bash command to set your computer aflame? This shit is not Xlibre !!!

I want a refund immediately. 🧛‍♀️

1
Woop Rule. (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

Woop!

 

Hello One Hundred (and) Ninety Six, I am totally normal this post (Pinky Promise! 🦶), please ask me anything and i will try not to bully you (as much as i can try! 🫣) 👩‍🔬

 

what a lovely day, chummin out at the blood pool.

Nothin else a meatwad like me could ask for...

 

A completely stateless society is something of a long lost tradition, but with the creation of the "civilized" people's and their governing bodies, it is nothing more than downgrade to those who grew up in such sheltered conditions.

What solutions do we have for a completly MODERN stateless society?

Will we organize as a group of people in hopes to establish a territory for ourselves? Or do we simply live and let live regardless of what government we currently live under, making do with what we we have? If by organizing in the current world, wouldn't we involuntarily create a border by itself (If we are allowed to exist)? How will we interact with other states and their societies?

These are some questions i ask myself when looking at the current state of the world, and if the idea of a stateless society should exist in practice, how can we replicate the idea in the most pure form?

Do we become pirates? Underground black market criminals? Wreckless revolutionaries?

In a place without the state, how can we ensure the state remains without governance? After all, we can see that even without government, hiearchy can still exist and take a foothold within certain communities which leads to disruption, how do we ensure ourselves that we won't let this happen?

Even with power, can one be truly responsible to hold it? Even if collectively? Is government innevitable? By definition, yes, but i mean truly.. is there no way around it? Is Anarchy nothing more than a lifestyle as they say?

What is the ideal Anarchist stance on life and how it could be lived (not should)? Is it true to the definition of Anarchy? Every person for themselves, or each person for one another?

(please let this be an opportunity to roughdraft in ways we could create a vast and large mutual aid system with a cross continental community in mind, this is something that is often ignored -at least in my perspective- in the anarchist community, what would the mid game of revolution look like? and how can we ensure our people have what they need in times of persecution? Is all i'm asking.)

maybe i'm missing something too, if anyone is willing to provide any material that may answer my questions, all i need is a title, but a link would suffice too.

and for the potential Anprim advocates out there, what are you doing on a computer? 😑

 

Do i regret making this? No, i was actually excited, i couldn't stop my knee from banging the desk for fucks sake! It's like when a dog does a 360 and hits you in the face with it's tail, like, what that fuck is wrong with you? what is wrong with me? I DON'T KNOW!

I don't need help, no, i need quite the opposite actually, i need this behaviour to be enabled in me. I CAN HONE IT. But it will come at the cost of your collective hate, and you know what? Bring. It. On. Onehundred (and) Ninety Six!!!

 

I deserve more rulepoints for my dual rulepost, that's all i have to say about this current situation.

Mods, fix it! 🫵😾

1
Conquest of Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Pecking at rulecrumbs, I'm a filthy proletariat, watch me rule.

 

where the hell are my witches at.. 🧹🐸🌙

view more: next ›