I majorly sucked as a kid
Beaver
I'm hoping she takes off
Afternoon hang with Simon and a cupa tea in the English countryside sounds so cozy
How does he do it?!
If I try to restrict to the smaller channels (some of these are quite big anyhow, but whatever):
Kaze Emanuar
Mario 64 modding focus, with coding deep dives
https://www.youtube.com/@KazeN64
Decino
Classic Doom content, with coding deep dives
https://www.youtube.com/@decino
Timbah.On.Toast
Music and culture focused video essays
https://www.youtube.com/@TimbahOnToast
José
Musings on historical sitcoms and conservative media
https://www.youtube.com/@JoseBird
Cass Eris
Scathing book reviews of pop psychology
https://www.youtube.com/@CassEris
Dr. Fatima
Astrophysics, Space, and Politics
https://www.youtube.com/@dr.fatima
Simon Roper
Linguistics and other stuff
https://www.youtube.com/@simonroper9218
Clickspring
Precision hand manufacturing
https://www.youtube.com/@Clickspring
Acorn to Arabella
Wooden sailboat build, and now sailing
Of all the guntubers, he's the one that most strikes me as eager to participate in a death squad. I used to watch his videos, but his little off-handed comments got genuinely quite frightening.
I hope all ICE officers comically slip on a banana peel
Quick, we gotta figure out his blood quantum!
No to "all life going extinct". Previous great extinction events have been triggered by truly wild shifts in global climate, albeit over longer periods than we are experiencing right now. And while there was a huge loss in diversity and living biomass for an extensive period of time after those conditions (lasting at the very least thousands to hundreds of thousands of years), life is resilient and bounces back once conditions stabilize.
The problem for humans is: we and our livestock are most of the animal biomass on earth.
(it's writing/research, so like, engaging in a discipline and looking at what's been written before on your topic, etc.)
BTW, I took time to look up some of these sources my student used, couldn't find the quotes they quote, so told them the paper is an "A" if they can show me every quotation and failing otherwise. Does this seem like a fair policy (my thought is -- no matter the method, fabrication of evidence is justification for failing work)?
I think they will learn an important life lesson: that if they're going to cheat, then they have to, at a minimum, be sure that they are at least "getting the right answer". The tide of AI dystopia is unstoppable, but you can at least teach them that they can't just completely shut their brains off to the extent that they are just presenting completely fabricated research and factual claims.
This is kind of a restating of the apocryphal Friedman quote about how a work gang in China should use spoons instead of shovels if it's a jobs program. This seems to be the extent of western understanding of how Communism is supposed to work.
Women romancing men, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!