this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

News

23622 readers
3255 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

TikTok’s request to pause a pending ban and January 19th sale deadline was denied by a federal appeals court.

The court upheld the constitutionality of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, citing national security concerns.

TikTok, owned by Chinese company ByteDance, has until January 19th to sell or face a ban.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's that "free market" again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

China doesn't have a free market and does not allow US-based social media in the country. Why should the US allow China to operate in the US without reciprocity?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Platform is kill. Most of the users are quite casual and not technically inclined and will simply give up if they can’t reinstall the application from the store.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Just need to now pass and implement a Protecting Americans from Domestic Adversary Controlled Applications Act with adversary defined as all the data stealing, data selling, shareholder value maximizing, endless increasing profit, grotesquely capitalistic, corporations.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This all seems so pointless while sites like X thrive.

And now I'm realizing Musk will ensure it does get banned so he can slurp everyone up into his own foreign interference cesspool.

Hopefully they all go to BlueSky instead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I’d like all of these data harvesting scumbags to get a kick where the sun don’t shine.

I’m not gonna boo one getting it because another hasn’t yet. I’m gonna cheer and hope for another.

Granted that’s not likely under the guy who wants to separate families and give billionaires tax cuts.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Wdym pointless? That is the point. The other big social media companies and their leaders can be easily influenced by US politicians while TikTok so far couldnt. Thats why it is being banned.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

TikTok users aren't going to Bluesky, they'll go to IG. Perhaps Reels, but I doubt it

X is loosing users to Bluesky, but much more slowly than right after the election. Engagement is much higher per follower there and everyone I've seen has been happy to move but I also think it's about a critical mass of big accounts moving over and bringing their followers. A lot of left wing journalists are there. A lot of news has broken there before X, but I actually learned about Mangione's arrest here on Lemmy first.

I think Bluesky has potential, I joined after the election when it was gaining attention (deleted my Twitter account long ago) and it was around 18M users. It gained another 3 million rapid fire, but now I think it just hit 24 or 25M. So the X-odus could use another kick in the pants.

I don't necessarily like huge social networks, but I'm voting for it to kill X.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Getting to the spot to shut it off. I thought this all would work out, one way or another. Now, I'm starting to think maybe it won't

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll move it out of the US, either shore up web app access or deliver applications through other means. That does leave a lot of iOS users in the dark though

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That doesn't really matter. They can still block it from the US very easily.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's nothing very easy about blocking it. Unlimited funding, unlimited addressing, unlimited posting opportunities. In the end they'd have to block every company willing to let them run a proxy.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are master routers at 5 Inter Exchange Points in the US. Block the Tik tok domain in those 5 routers and it's done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You think that five "routers" in the US can block a domain name?

Do you think that they have to use a domain name?

Do you think that they have to use static IP addresses or even ranges?

Do you think they can't implement tor or I2P inside their app?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't understand the network. You think it's your ISP. It's not. Now we can go into fundamentals, but perhaps it would be easier to ask yourself how China can lock out web sites, which it does, and why the US would be any different. All this would take is a court order to AT&T.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah pal, I fully understand the internet. I was around for it to be made, not right at the beginning but certainly before any of the actual public was using it. I've been in IT the whole time.

I fully understand how DNS and BGP work. I was even around for EGP, But I have a lot less knowledge about it.

China is designed architecturally with a state-run filter with packet inspection at every egress point. China has requirements that every company in their borders provide them access control. If any company outside of China wishes to host anything in China they have to partner with the Chinese company that is already satisfied these positions and host with that company. They can do all of this because they are an authoritarian regime designed from the ground up to do so.

You have absolutely no idea of the difference in scope of which you're insinuating.

Seeing the Tik Tok was not registered in the US It can't be ICEd easily.

You could issue court orders for each ISP to block that domain, At which point they could stand up 50 more.

I'll ask you again, do you think they need to use a domain name for their app?

At the very least it's ingress is in Amazon so you could have Amazon shut them down, I can't imagine that they would not have a geo-responsible disaster recovery plan already good to go.

How is AT&T going to stop you from using an SSL DNS server outside the country? How is AT&T going to stop you from making direct SSL connections to a gigantic pool of dynamic IP addresses?

Do you think that AT&T can handle deep packet inspection on the whole network level? How large would a server farm need to be? How much do you think that would cost for them, how much do you think it would cost for Comcast, Verizon, level3, Cogent? How many years do you think it would take them to comply with that?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My my. Yes, AT&T does deep packet network inspection at a network level aa rregular business. It has to because it's moving other protocols than Internet. The others you mention, Comcast et all, do not because they peer with aT&t and don't need to.

Frankly, this is what I didn't want to do. Trying to to explain how the backbone works will fry my little tablet. So let's do this. I admit you're right about everthing and we can both move on.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay great, how does DPI work with SSL?

We can play cat and mouse all day... Yeah I'm done here as well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

What is it about moving on don't you understand?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe they should donate to trump’s inauguration fund. That seems to gain his favor.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

Nah there are too many left radicalizing videos on the platform for Trump to ever approve. (Ignore the overwhelming torrent of Trumpets and MAGAtts on the app - they don't matter to him)